Full Site Search  
Fri Feb 24, 2017 04:39:17 IST
PostPostPost Trn TipPost Trn TipPost Stn TipPost Stn TipAdvanced Search
×
Forum Super Search
Blog Entry#:
Words:

HashTag:
Member:
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
Train:
Station:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

<<prev entry    next entry>>
Blog Entry# 1405907  
Posted: Mar 24 2015 (13:22)

4 Responses
Last Response: Mar 25 2015 (09:17)
  
Predictions: 21
confirm: 21
rac: 0
wl: 0
Journey: Wed Mar 25, 2015 @ 19:05
Class: Sleeper - SL   |   Tot Seats: Avbl 369   |   Charting: < 11:00
Travel: DLI/Old Delhi Junction   to   SDAH/Sealdah   |   1453 km / 1453 km
12330/West Bengal Sampark Kranti Express
Entry# 1405907

Posted by: Divert ShalimarGorakhpur Express via BKSC*^   4282 blog posts   4467 correct pred (76% accurate)
PNR: 253-xxxxxxx    |   Similar PNRs
Posted Status as of: Mar 24 2015 (13:22)
Passenger 1: Waitlist# 5 (Booking Status: W/L 9,CK)
Chart NOT Prepared

Please analyze this PNR, and predict the final Charting Status. Thanks.

Latest Status as of: Mar 26 2015 (09:59)
Passenger 1: S11,38 [UB]/Coach Position:8 (Booking Status: W/L 9,CK)
Chart PREPARED

  
827 views
Mar 24 2015 (20:11)
Divert ShalimarGorakhpur Express via BKSC*^   4282 blog posts   4467 correct pred (76% accurate)
Re# 1405907-1            Tags   Past Edits
GNWL#88 vs CKWL#1 ??
Is not it the rule to clear GNWL before CKWL now ? Currently there is GNWL#88 for 25.03.2015 in SL of this train. Chances of confirmation of CKWL#1 ?

  
819 views
Mar 25 2015 (08:32)
Divert ShalimarGorakhpur Express via BKSC*^   4282 blog posts   4467 correct pred (76% accurate)
Re# 1405907-2            Tags   Past Edits
CONFIRMED ? Can anyone enlighten me how this got confirm if the current general waiting is GNWL#93 ? Why those 93 people are still waiting and CK got confirmed ? Actually this has put my credibility as an admin in questions as this PNR is of my friend and I had told him to cancel CKWL because it gets last priority. But here I see CKWL got confirmed when still GNWL is 93. Plus, there would be RAC passengers as well.

  
901 views
Mar 25 2015 (08:38)
»»Jai»Maata«Di««*^~   1328 blog posts   26071 correct pred (73% accurate)
Re# 1405907-3            Tags   Past Edits
Just cancellation effect.... before the chart prepared.

  
729 views
Mar 25 2015 (09:17)
Ankit*^   3165 blog posts   121161 correct pred (78% accurate)
Re# 1405907-4            Tags   Past Edits
Yes, you are correct to say that CKWL gets lesser priority in confirmation, while utilizing unused quota seats during charting, but this one has confirmed before charting itself, i.e. through shear cancellation of tickets this one has confirmed...so that is why GNWL 93 remained as it is, and CKWL got cleared...
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom


Go to Desktop site