Search Forum
PNR Entry# 1405907
Posted: Mar 24 2015 (13:22)
4 Responses
Last Response: Mar 25 2015 (09:17)
4 Responses
Last Response: Mar 25 2015 (09:17)
PREDICTIONS: 21
Journey: Wed Mar 25, 2015
Dep: ANVT/Anand Vihar Terminal @ 20:20 PF#: 4
Arr: SDAH/Sealdah @ 16:35 +1 night
Distance: 1447 km / 1447 km
Class: Sleeper - SL | Tot Seats: Avbl-0424# | Charting @15:00
12330/West Bengal Sampark Kranti Express (PT)Dep: ANVT/Anand Vihar Terminal @ 20:20 PF#: 4
Arr: SDAH/Sealdah @ 16:35 +1 night
Distance: 1447 km / 1447 km
Class: Sleeper - SL | Tot Seats: Avbl-0424# | Charting @15:00
PNR: 253-xxxxxxx | Similar PNRs
Entry# 1405907
NO PENDING REQUEST
Posted: Mar 24 2015 (13:22:33) View Posted Status
Latest Status: Mar 26 2015 (09:59:41)
Passenger 1: S11,38 [UB]/Coach Position:8 (Booking Status: W/L 9,CK)Chart PREPARED
GNWL#88 vs CKWL#1 ??
Is not it the rule to clear GNWL before CKWL now ? Currently there is GNWL#88 for 25.03.2015 in SL of this train. Chances of confirmation of CKWL#1 ?
Is not it the rule to clear GNWL before CKWL now ? Currently there is GNWL#88 for 25.03.2015 in SL of this train. Chances of confirmation of CKWL#1 ?
CONFIRMED ? Can anyone enlighten me how this got confirm if the current general waiting is GNWL#93 ? Why those 93 people are still waiting and CK got confirmed ? Actually this has put my credibility as an admin in questions as this PNR is of my friend and I had told him to cancel CKWL because it gets last priority. But here I see CKWL got confirmed when still GNWL is 93. Plus, there would be RAC passengers as well.
Yes, you are correct to say that CKWL gets lesser priority in confirmation, while utilizing unused quota seats during charting, but this one has confirmed before charting itself, i.e. through shear cancellation of tickets this one has confirmed...so that is why GNWL 93 remained as it is, and CKWL got cleared...