Search Forum
Blog Entry# 15642
Posted: Dec 10 2009 (12:40)
17 Responses
Last Response: Dec 15 2009 (14:54)
17 Responses
Last Response: Dec 15 2009 (14:54)
dear bloggers ! as we know that delhi metros are running in good shape and they truly reflect the positive side of india. but as we know india is a big country, then why we can't afford bullet trains (350km/hr) across the country. as we are the second biggest economic hub. and we always curse our population rather than using it as manpower like china. why we don't oppose the ugly looking mumbai locals. it is actually the politicians ,who are enjoying on our money. there is really no growth in the speed of railway sectors. making or launching of 100 new trains of 50 km/hr speed is not going to solve our purpose.
dear bloggers i everyday look a new small...
more...
dear bloggers i everyday look a new small...
more...
13 Public Posts - Thu Dec 10, 2009
Yes Vinitaji, aware of that fact of Europe, UK, USA. But history cannot be denied. UK was the first nation to start trains. But their road network overtook the railways. Next came US. Trains came later, but their road network is such, and cost of petrol is so cheap that people use the highways at 120/140 kmph, and avoid trains. If you are keeping in touch regularly you will find that railways in US are now running in losses, except in few cases. Plus, air travel is so prevalent that even small cities, say for example, in India, Agra next to Delhi will have as many as twenty or more flights. An example from America: New York to Boston has turnaround flights every 15 minutes and takes exactly 45 mns. Why should anyone use a train which will take nearly three/four hours? Same is the case with Europe. There are...
more...
more...
2 Public Posts - Mon Dec 14, 2009
1 Public Posts - Tue Dec 15, 2009