Search Forum
Blog Entry# 79995
Posted: Oct 24 2010 (12:28)
10 Responses
Last Response: Nov 22 2010 (09:39)
10 Responses
Last Response: Nov 22 2010 (09:39)
Dear Sir, thanks for your prediction, 7 out of 10 W/L tickets were confirmed and 3 got updated to RAC. We had boarded 1057 from MMR at 0440 am with 3 PNR nos but during boarding one person lost his purse containing Icard. First TT did not check Icards and shown us as boarded but now the new TT is saying all three passengers in that PNR will be treated as w/o ticket so charged accordingly. Actually these 3 tickets were in RAC so if we are paying penalty and charges for new ticket 9being treated as w/o ticket), we should get refund for RAC tickets but TT says previous TT has shown you boarded so refund will not be possible. It seems flaw in rules, pls advise. regards, Gulshan.
7 Posts
Sir FIR will be helping or not is a different issue
you have to work/act, in/within law.
Can you explain why RPF wont entertain ?
Isnt it their part of job/duty?
you have to work/act, in/within law.
Can you explain why RPF wont entertain ?
Isnt it their part of job/duty?
You tell me why he will entertain the pax ? Is it some criminal case for which u r suggesting him to file "FIR"
ID need to be shown on demand, anytime during journey, when on-board, if travelling with E-Ticket!!
First TTE check is immaterialistic in this case!!
If TTE has clicked journeying on that PNR (as per E-Ticket), irctc shall find problem in settlement of claim afterwards!!
It matters, what slip has shown, same berth, as been ticket by first TTE or different!!
If...
more...
First TTE check is immaterialistic in this case!!
If TTE has clicked journeying on that PNR (as per E-Ticket), irctc shall find problem in settlement of claim afterwards!!
It matters, what slip has shown, same berth, as been ticket by first TTE or different!!
If...
more...