Full Site Search  
Fri Feb 24, 2017 21:08:31 IST
PostPostPost Trn TipPost Trn TipPost Stn TipPost Stn TipAdvanced Search
×
Forum Super Search
Blog Entry#:
Words:

HashTag:
Member:
Posting Date From:
Posting Date To:
Train Type:
Train:
Station:
ONLY with Pic/Vid:
Sort by: Date:     Word Count:     Popularity:     
Public:    Pvt: Monitor:    RailFan Club:    

<<prev entry    next entry>>
Blog Entry# 935041  
Posted: Dec 15 2013 (00:10)

6 Responses
Last Response: Dec 15 2013 (18:33)
  
Predictions: 18
confirm: 0
rac: 0
wl: 18
Journey: Sun Dec 15, 2013 @ 11:40
Class: Sleeper - SL   |   Tot Seats: Avbl 302   |   Charting: < 08:00
Travel: LTT/Lokmanya Tilak Terminus   to   TCR/Thrissur (Trichur)   |   1219 km / 1499 km
16345/Netravati Express (PT)
Entry# 935041

Posted by: dhawalk99   0 blog posts
PNR: 821-xxxxxxx    |   Similar PNRs
Posted Status as of: Dec 15 2013 (00:10)
Passenger 1: Waitlist# 39 (Booking Status: W/L 45,CK)
Chart NOT Prepared

Please analyze this PNR, and predict the final Charting Status. Thanks.

Latest Status as of: Dec 15 2013 (19:17)
Passenger 1: S3,44/Coach Position:5 (Booking Status: W/L 45,CK)
Chart PREPARED

1 posts - Sun Dec 15, 2013

  
1464 views
Dec 15 2013 (16:13)
DJ™^~   15435 blog posts   185350 correct pred (76% accurate)
Re# 935041-2            Tags   Past Edits

  
1159 views
Dec 15 2013 (16:59)
DB*^~   33537 blog posts   224048 correct pred (71% accurate)
Re# 935041-3            Tags   Past Edits
1) There is no factual evidence that #lowerberthquota is supported for Tatkal Booking.
2) A minimum and maximum of 2 berths per every sleeping coach are always reserved against the abovementioned quota against General Booking. Where from would these extra lower berths would come in for Tatkal cum Lower Berth Quota?
3) This one too should have had confirmed against the abovementioned quota?
...
more...
/pnr/post/233746
Unless there is any solid and concrete proof or evidence that Tatkal supports #lowerberthquota booking, please avoid stating the same time and again.
Thanks for understanding.

  
975 views
Dec 15 2013 (17:39)
छोटा आदमी~   6799 blog posts   99587 correct pred (90% accurate)
Re# 935041-4            Tags   Past Edits
citing more than 2 years old data is irrelevant. i agree with you that there is no factual evidence which explicitly suggest #lowerberthquota in Tatkal bookings. Agree on that !

  
892 views
Dec 15 2013 (18:25)
छोटा आदमी~   6799 blog posts   99587 correct pred (90% accurate)
Re# 935041-6            Tags   Past Edits
dear dipyaman ji,
here is a more credible evidence of LowerBerthQuota in Tatkal Bookings. please have a look at this PNR /pnr/post/830392. Infact, you have also agreed about #lowerberthquota in Tatkal booking via blogpost /blog/post/830392/5.
thanks. !!

  
829 views
Dec 15 2013 (18:33)
DB*^~   33537 blog posts   224048 correct pred (71% accurate)
Re# 935041-7            Tags   Past Edits
Sub post 5 seems to be an error on my part. Sorry for that.
Now edited.
PS:- I do not deny that there is no inside hand in Railways. However, none of the two PNR examples given in the sub post 6 of your above mentioned link can suggest the presence of #lowerberthquota in TaTKAL!!
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom


Go to Desktop site