Spotting
 Timeline
 Travel Tip
 Trip
 Race
 Social
 Greeting
 Poll
 Img
 PNR
 Pic
 Blog
 News
 Conf TL
 RF Club
 Convention
 Monitor
 Topic
 #
 Rating
 Correct
 Wrong
 Stamp
 PNR Ref
 PNR Req
 Blank PNRs
 HJ
 Vote
 Pred
 @
 FM Alert
 FM Approval
 Pvt

RailCal app

site support

ट्रेनों का सफर, ज़िन्दगी का सफर, रेलफैन दोनों में माहिर

Search Forum
<<prev entry    next entry>>
Blog Entry# 1883345
Posted: Jun 07 2016 (00:20)

5 Responses
Last Response: Jun 14 2016 (22:50)
Poll
6984 views
36 votes
2

Jun 07 2016 (00:20)   12259/Sealdah - Bikaner AC Duronto Express
 
guest   6387 blog posts
Entry# 1883345            Tags  
Should the Decision of IR of 3-Phase Link withdrawal from 12259/12260 is justified ?
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi
NO vote
Yes It's absolutely justified IR has taken the Correct Decision by giving the Charge of this Train to WAP-4
22%
8
No IR has taken Completely wrong decision by withdrawing WAP-5/WAP-7 from this Train as 3-Phase Link was better than the Present Link with this Train
67%
24
Don't have any idea regarding this
11%
4

3905 views
1

Jun 07 2016 (00:25)
Mayank Singh~   2372 blog posts
Re# 1883345-1              
Could any body explain what happened? Is the 3-phase link[which was withdrawn] superior to the newly given link?
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

2 Public Posts - Fri Jun 10, 2016

2 Public Posts - Tue Jun 14, 2016
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom
Go to Desktop site
Important Note: This website NEVER solicits for Money or Donations. Please beware of anyone requesting/demanding money on behalf of IRI. Thanks.
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.
India Rail Info Privacy Policy