Search Forum
Blog Entry# 1889394
Posted: Jun 11 2016 (08:11)
16 Responses
Last Response: Jun 17 2016 (09:44)
16 Responses
Last Response: Jun 17 2016 (09:44)
IR Affairs
CR/Central
Baaz_SGUJ_WDP4~ 123 news posts
New Delhi: With the Hospet-Hubli-Londa-Vasco and Bangalore-Hubli track doubling projects already in progress, the cabinet committee on economic affairs chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently...
11 Posts
Chennai-Mumbai route is already criticized for being a slow route. Trains running through alternative routes via-SWR will be more slower, making them unattractive for end-to-end passengers. Connections to Mumbai for interior Karnataka can be provided from SBC or MYS( As SBC also requires more dedicated connections to Mumbai). For BAY and UBL, SR has floated proposals to increase the frequency of MAS-Vasco, but was turned by SWR multiple times. It is SWR's responsibility to provide dedicated connections to MAS for BAY/BJP etc. Chennai division will be more concerned about the connection to Mumbai/Pune/Vasco than the intermediate stations in other zones. As of now, the shortest route via Guntakal ( not Gundakkal, just correcting) should be sped up first, before focusing on alternative routes between MAS-Mumbai.
The coordination between sr and swr has resulted in cancellation of mas ubl spl via bay and made the rake lay idle at ubl
reg VSG train,its not only from SCR,from any zone to VSG it will be rejected by saying some Numbers