Search Forum
Blog Entry# 2046143
Posted: Nov 03 2016 (08:18)
5 Responses
Last Response: Nov 03 2016 (09:50)
5 Responses
Last Response: Nov 03 2016 (09:50)
I.R. wants to accommodate more passengers in SL. Which of the following 2 is a better option?
1 Posts
Agree with you ....
But in some of the recent blogs, it is observed that
1. some members oppose 2 RAC on SLB bcoz "Pay full & get half seat".
2. some members strongly oppose SMB bcoz it is not comfortable.
So,...
more...
But in some of the recent blogs, it is observed that
1. some members oppose 2 RAC on SLB bcoz "Pay full & get half seat".
2. some members strongly oppose SMB bcoz it is not comfortable.
So,...
more...
Smb r useless
In side berths 2 people r there one on top & other lower now if smb is apso there 3 people would b there means 10-12 extra people in the coaches
Also during day time where will the two sit as there exist a fasaad smb not even allowing to sit with head straight ( just like middle berth open & u sit in lb)
In side berths 2 people r there one on top & other lower now if smb is apso there 3 people would b there means 10-12 extra people in the coaches
Also during day time where will the two sit as there exist a fasaad smb not even allowing to sit with head straight ( just like middle berth open & u sit in lb)
It's just waste of money
Rat m sone k lye berth to puri ml rhi h na aur 2-2 windows & seat at level of windows ab aur kya chahiye rac m
Rat m sone k lye berth to puri ml rhi h na aur 2-2 windows & seat at level of windows ab aur kya chahiye rac m
Its correct that in RAC - Pay Full for half seat, but its better than SMB because of Its very uncomfortable for the passenger with SM birth