Search Forum
Blog Entry# 2056324
Posted: Nov 11 2016 (15:28)
6 Responses
Last Response: Apr 16 2017 (09:30)
6 Responses
Last Response: Apr 16 2017 (09:30)
This needs speed up. 4 hr 15 min too much. Already ECR 4 line road working getting finished. By bus will take 2 hr 30 min from Tiruvanmayur.
1 Posts
This train should be upgraded to SF ..
It should start early at PDY(5 AM) and reach MS in 3 hrs.
It should be extended to BZA and the present JS(12077) should be scrapped.
It should start early at PDY(5 AM) and reach MS in 3 hrs.
It should be extended to BZA and the present JS(12077) should be scrapped.
OK what about the return then it will reach MS at 2230 Pondy at 130.changing time to 500 will defeat the purpose of the train which is expected to serve daily travellers to reach at office of 900 to 1000.I don't think the journey time can be cut to 3 hrs.
PDY - VM its 30 mins
VM - MS 2 hrs 30 mins should be sufficient ..
Coming to JS
12077 JS should be re-routed Via TEL instead of NGNT ..(There r multiple buses from TEL to GNT)
If...
more...
VM - MS 2 hrs 30 mins should be sufficient ..
Coming to JS
12077 JS should be re-routed Via TEL instead of NGNT ..(There r multiple buses from TEL to GNT)
If...
more...
Don't think 6 hrs to egmore is possible for intercity with stops during daytime. Will GNT representatives be ready to divert it back to mainline is a big question. They will ask to reroute pinakini via NGNT are u open for such proposal?? Turnaround time in BZA maintenance time at PDY not sufficient 5 hrs is too low the effective time available is just 4 hrs according to your timings. Some trains which are introduced to benefit local travellers serving office goers and business travellers should not be extended to other places.
I that was the case .. at-least 12077 JS should be converted normal SF Exp (24 Coaches) like Pinakini ..
The present train is not sufficient to the existing demand
The present train is not sufficient to the existing demand