Search Forum
Blog Entry# 2084444
Posted: Dec 08 2016 (17:36)
12 Responses
Last Response: Dec 09 2016 (22:43)
12 Responses
Last Response: Dec 09 2016 (22:43)
click here
MY STRICT FEELING IS CM SHOULD NOT ACCEPT BULB LINE .
7 Posts
anna bulb line is not possible navy and port will oppose due to security reasons.
let them start some thing. Even 3rd line ki kuda 104 area daggara problem
The bulb line will be over ground 3rd and 4th line parallel to present lines on right side of the present lnes in port railway slidings pass under convent flyover and track raises to flyover over port roads and lands before the entrance (south side) of present chavulamandam bridge. So the height of bridge can also be raised by 1.5m and submergence of road under bridge can also be prevented. By this running time I'll not decrease but loco reversal can be averted and stoppage ill be decreased by 10mins. In I'll not hurt rly importance of station in any way as it continue to serve as catering station crew change and watering.this line I'll run totally on port lines and area and no way nearer to defence lands. As the proposal was bought by ECOr it may see some light and they may do detailed studies about the project. It...
more...
more...
ya ecor has that kind of working style. IF they propose one they will do it as soon as possible. The same they done for Simhachalan north bypass towards duvvada also they did in no time.