Search Forum
Blog Entry# 2956991
Posted: Dec 31 2017 (21:55)
6 Responses
Last Response: Jan 02 2018 (00:09)
6 Responses
Last Response: Jan 02 2018 (00:09)
Dec 31 2017 (21:55) IMG16040-1746701/♥♥Vasco-Rameswaram Express(Via-MAJN,MYS,SBC)♥♥
1944 net green flags 3 green per TrainCustom Ratings
TamilpesumINDIAN~
TamilpesumINDIAN~ 610 img trains 153 popular1944 net green flags 3 green per TrainCustom Ratings
1 Posts
Also, it is almost impossible to get a slot between Sakleshpur and Subramya Road on account of a cap on passenger trains as a result of a contract between HMRDC and SWR. No new trains have been started on this route for a long time now. As this link will show you, there are only three pairs of trains (slots) on this route. /search/2847/0/2846
As i said that this train can be introduced after complete electrification between MAO-MAJN/MAQ loco change cannot be a mistake.
How will crossing with trains can become a mistake? Tis is casual in Single Lines. Can you explain please.
How will crossing with trains can become a mistake? Tis is casual in Single Lines. Can you explain please.
My wish is this train may be benifiary to the people of these places. Introducing or not introducing is IR's wish.
KR electrification may take a few years but you are right, yours is a futuristic train, so it is okay. It may be casual to have crossings on single lines, but the point is that the speed of the train gets reduced if there are more crossings. So you have to look at the number of crossings before the speed is decided. Anyway, it is your imaginary train, you are the one in control, so you can do exactly as you want. Please ignore the feedback/suggestions if you so wish
If it is only for the beneficiaries of the stations, then it is fine. As it is an imaginary train, it is upto you to consider whether the contract between HMRDC and SWR is important or not.