Search Forum
Blog Entry# 4664470
Posted: Jul 08 2020 (11:13)
13 Responses
Last Response: Dec 29 2020 (21:28)
13 Responses
Last Response: Dec 29 2020 (21:28)
Jul 08 2020 (11:13) 12724/Telangana Express (PT) | SC/Secunderabad Junction (10 PFs)
SCoR~
SCoR~ 1812 blog postsHow divisions should be in SCR after SCoR formation
NO vote
Hyderabad.Secunderabad.Nanded (as existing)
28%
12
Hyderabad.Secunderabad.Nanded.Kazipet/Warangal.
5%
2
Hyderabad.Secunderabad.Nanded.Kazipet/Warangal.Aurangabad
65%
28
Any other please mention
2%
1
8 Posts
Division won't solve anything. Aurangabad's problem is its location and lack of political representation.
For any train, the revenue from the train is divided between all the zones it passes through in the same proportion as the distance covered by the train in that zone. Typically 5% is reserved for the zone maintaining the rake and the remaining 95% is split according to the distance traveled. This does not depend on the number halts etc.
...
more...
For any train, the revenue from the train is divided between all the zones it passes through in the same proportion as the distance covered by the train in that zone. Typically 5% is reserved for the zone maintaining the rake and the remaining 95% is split according to the distance traveled. This does not depend on the number halts etc.
...
more...
Hello
First try to respect people sentiments. Even formation of Telangana is waste of money. Why It was formed??
First try to respect people sentiments. Even formation of Telangana is waste of money. Why It was formed??
Aurangabad can become div HQ but for CR and not for SCR. It can be done by transferring MMR-AWB section to CR. This will solve almost 80% problems in this section/region, be them revenue related, logistical, operational or railway employee related. My gut feeling tells that Aurangabad- Ahemadnagar and Aurangabad-Chalisgaon lines can be get sanctioned in coming future. So new Aurangabad devision can have following sections:
1. Manmad(excluding)-Aurangabad( excluding or CR part of stn)
2. Manmad-puntamba-Shirdi
3....
more...
1. Manmad(excluding)-Aurangabad( excluding or CR part of stn)
2. Manmad-puntamba-Shirdi
3....
more...
It will still be the same problem even if there is a transfer to CR and if there is a new division formed. Aurangabad is still at the boundary of a zone, so originating traffic heading out of the zone will be very unlikely.
At the most, it might create room for extension of some Bombay-Manmad train to AWB, but originating trains from AWB, going towards Bhusaval via MMR will still be unlikely. They will get extended to NED to cover as many places as possible with a single train. In...
more...
At the most, it might create room for extension of some Bombay-Manmad train to AWB, but originating trains from AWB, going towards Bhusaval via MMR will still be unlikely. They will get extended to NED to cover as many places as possible with a single train. In...
more...
In the 2003 Railway Budget, the Railway Minister announced in parliament the establishment of a Railway Division with Nizamabad as its Center. But due to pressure from Maharastra leaders, the Nizamabad Railway Division was shifted to Nanded.😓😓😓
Although the division moved, Nizamabad was assured that Gangmen Coach Factory would be
Set up in Nizamabad without any injustice.
...
more...
Although the division moved, Nizamabad was assured that Gangmen Coach Factory would be
Set up in Nizamabad without any injustice.
...
more...