Search Forum
Filters:
Page# 421875 Blog Entries next>>
2 pics
More Posts
Today (11:30) 13174/Sabroom - Sealdah Kanchanjungha Express (PT) | RNI/Rangapani (2 PFs) | PUNE/WAG-9HC/43616
_V_K_^~
_V_K_^~ 59924 blog posts9 pics
Major accident at Rangapani, near NJP
Down Kanchanjunga hit from behind by a Goods Train
3 Coaches derailed. 5 dead. Many injured.
...
more...
Down Kanchanjunga hit from behind by a Goods Train
3 Coaches derailed. 5 dead. Many injured.
...
more...
3 Posts
Train no 13174 DN , Loco no-32308 /CNB, departure RNI at 8.27 hrs with authority TA912 .stop between RNX -CAT at km no-11/10,12,14. Due to automatic signalling failure from 05.50 hrs and TA 912 issue authourity for above train Same time train no DN GFCG cont , Loco no 43616 /PADX departure RNI at 8.42 hrs hit wirh 13174 DN in rear portion resulted Rear SLR, PCL VAN and and GS derailed. SLR badly damage and upon the loco hood of loco no 43616 PADX , wheel of SLR inter in Loco CAb and LP & ALP may be entangle Massage time 09. 01 hrs. Both up & DN line block and up & DN train मूवमेंट hampered.
Could not understand the language completely .. Was it an overshoot of signal from goods train LP
The train can be ran as KSR-Vasco panchaganga express. It really need to be extended. Needless to say it would be a connectivity not just for Bangalore people but also for chennai people if we could catch this by taking intercity or something. Vasco is also in SWR so this train could be extended easily
28 Posts
I feel like that should be fine. They can start RSA train as Karwar Vasco special and run it till Vasco
I dont personally object such RSA. but on generic note, TAT should given that it wont delay both sides. If such is possible no issues..
This has become almost the perfect train for Uttara Kanara passengers ever since it stopped going to MAQ and permanently got diverted via Kunigal. If only more coaches could be accommodated without hampering the timings.
There'd be more seats available at 16586 from Murdeshwar and 17310 from Madgaon, but most people would rather go board a train from Talguppa railway station instead.
...
more...
There'd be more seats available at 16586 from Murdeshwar and 17310 from Madgaon, but most people would rather go board a train from Talguppa railway station instead.
...
more...
Sir, Answer for 16515/16 Query is exactly in your first para itself - Bypass. Anything entering Mangalore Central or Mangalore Jn. would mean lots of time consumption due to Huge yards + Zonal Changeover point from SWR to SR & SR to KR & other formalities like Reversal/Attachment/Detachment, Checks, switch lines & turnouts speed etc. Udupi & Specially Uttara Kannada People least prefer because of Huge runtime & late arrival at enroute stations in KR due to least priority. Few from Udupi District do get down at Bantawala/Kabakaputtur & switchover to Buses to reach Home earlier then train.
If...
more...
If...
more...
Your opinion about Talguppa holds good. Almost Decade back, when Panchganga was non-existent & 16523/24 were running, Myself commuting to Blore from Kumta use to go to Talguppa & take 16228 to reach Blore faster & vice~versa. Even People from Byndoor/Kundapur taluks would do same.
Regarding connecting train to 16511, My opinion would be better to swap slots of 16511 with 16585, such that 16585 starts early from Blore take 16511 slot from Hassan, arrive early at Mlore & leave early towards Murudeshwar. That would also mean early arrival at Murudeshwar &...
more...
Regarding connecting train to 16511, My opinion would be better to swap slots of 16511 with 16585, such that 16585 starts early from Blore take 16511 slot from Hassan, arrive early at Mlore & leave early towards Murudeshwar. That would also mean early arrival at Murudeshwar &...
more...
Major train accident, Kachanjunga exp hit by goods train. Tragic news.
38 Posts
Having more AC coaches than non AC coaches in Express trains specifically is definitely a break with the tradition. That's what I said, yes UPA government might've increased the number of AC coaches but in no way AC coaches were more than non AC coaches.
Do you even understand what I said? What can opposition use against Lalu? He kept the fares same for 5 years. Which is great as a populist measure, but unsustainable for long term financial health. Now if someone suddenly increase fares across the board, opposition will be up in arms. Applies to both sides. Even if there is a INDIA alliance govt, no one will dare to increase fares.
Well if you keep increasing, at some point no of AC coaches will be more. At start of UPA era, most trains had 2 or 3 AC, at end of 10 years UPA, most had 6-7 AC. Now after 10 years NDA most have 10-11 AC. Most premium trains introduced by UPA - Garib Rath, AC express, Duronto all max. AC.
What I'm saying is since the present government did not had or have enough guts right now to increase the fare of train tickets at this time or in previous terms (when they had more than half of Lok Sabha seats single-handedly) + inflation is low than 2000s too because of the fear of retaliation they'll face from opposition.
Why do we expect Lalu to raise the fare of train tickets when he was an RM in a coalition government which lacked enough seats to make a government single-handedly. + inflation...
more...
Why do we expect Lalu to raise the fare of train tickets when he was an RM in a coalition government which lacked enough seats to make a government single-handedly. + inflation...
more...
That's what you aren't understanding. Before Lalu's time it was a tradition to increase fares every year by small amount. So no one would have bothered if he raised in line with earlier RMs. But he broke from tradition to stop the yearly fare increase to get political brownie points. Dinesh Trivedi tried to reinstate that tradition and got fired immediately. So now no RM would have the guts no matter if he has majority, coz he will be removed by his own party and opposition will pounce on this.
Page# 421875 Blog Entries next>>