Search Forum
Blog Entry# 15761
Posted: Dec 11 2009 (19:21)
12 Responses
Last Response: Jan 21 2010 (14:16)
12 Responses
Last Response: Jan 21 2010 (14:16)
A request:
Please update the timings very soon as 2953/54 will be halting at ADH[Andheri] too...!
P.S: THe day is not far when this train will be known as "Mumbai rajdhani fast passenger according to the number of halts it has!
Please update the timings very soon as 2953/54 will be halting at ADH[Andheri] too...!
P.S: THe day is not far when this train will be known as "Mumbai rajdhani fast passenger according to the number of halts it has!
8 Posts
Sheer Stupidity, sorry for this phrase, but how can the time infact get reduced?? It might be static, but it just can't get reduced..!
The blogger is true that the travel time is reduced. One need not get down at Borivali or Mumbai Central, and catch a taxi and spend time and money. There are many passengers like that whose travel time is reduced due to stop at Andheri. If you look at the trend in the last few years, trains are having more stops at suburban stations in the same city. This helps reduce commutation cost and time, it helps to decongest terminal stations and also helps to reduce the load of entraining/detraining together at the same station.
Some ppl have the impression that adding halts increases the travel time of passengers.
.
Lets do some modeling here to prove this wrong:
.
Assume a train travels non-stop from BCT to Delhi in...
more...
.
Lets do some modeling here to prove this wrong:
.
Assume a train travels non-stop from BCT to Delhi in...
more...
Oh, I thought he meant that the travel time of the TRAIN gets reduced by adding more halts..sorry for the confusion :)