Search Forum
Blog Entry# 2134907
Posted: Jan 21 2017 (14:46)
43 Responses
Last Response: Apr 04 2018 (01:11)
43 Responses
Last Response: Apr 04 2018 (01:11)
It has been over 2 weeks since the appointment of the current batch of FMs and 750 Complaints have been handled so far. It gives me immense pleasure in congratulating them for running the team diligently, professionally, competently and above all, without a shred of controversy or bias. The FM position is, by its very nature, a thankless job. If there are ZERO incidents in the Forum, it is taken for granted. But if there is even a very slight incident, it doesn't take much time for some member to blow it up into a huge controversy, and after that, start blaming the system or FMs.
.
Members...
more...
.
Members...
more...
55 Posts
This is same what I am saying.
Giving SW can be fine because many times old members also become a cause of problem in open forum but old members should be permanently banned by Moderator only.
FMs are temporary , ban is permanent. So FMs should be allowed to ban only new members or members who have positive rating less then 100.
Giving SW can be fine because many times old members also become a cause of problem in open forum but old members should be permanently banned by Moderator only.
FMs are temporary , ban is permanent. So FMs should be allowed to ban only new members or members who have positive rating less then 100.
Subrat should be given Forum Monitorship regularly.😃. Experienced FM
The response to a poll on the effectiveness of this system has been good /blog/post/2897584
But still some issues can be sorted out to make it better.
But still some issues can be sorted out to make it better.