Search Forum
Blog Entry# 2191658
Posted: Mar 09 2017 (18:50)
9 Responses
Last Response: Mar 17 2017 (23:24)
9 Responses
Last Response: Mar 17 2017 (23:24)
Mar 09 2017 (18:50) 22498/Tiruchchirappalli - Shri Ganganagar Humsafar Express
Aravind KS~
Aravind KS~ 184 blog postsDo you think SGNR - TPJ - SGNR Humsafar will gain enough patronage ?
Also comment whether the TT of the train is justified
Also comment whether the TT of the train is justified
4 Posts
Some of the imminent drawbacks of Trichy-Sriganganagar HS
very low occupancy expected from Bikaner to Sriganganagar.
Low occupancy from Bikaner-JDP and
not so good occupancy from Trichy to Krishnarajapuram
Timing...
more...
very low occupancy expected from Bikaner to Sriganganagar.
Low occupancy from Bikaner-JDP and
not so good occupancy from Trichy to Krishnarajapuram
Timing...
more...
Yes , my view is also the same . It doesnt even stop at Bangalore for enough time
has earn good patronage from ahmedabad but can't about sriganganagr
I cant vote, I am confused. The Humsafar train should have been run between Bikaner and Bengaluru, which would have been better. As someone else too said, SGNR-TPJ better deserves weekly SF train. Secondly, the speed of train could have been more than 60 kmph. WR can have 80 kmph avg speed.