Spotting
 Timeline
 Travel Tip
 Trip
 Race
 Social
 Greeting
 Poll
 Img
 PNR
 Pic
 Blog
 News
 Conf TL
 RF Club
 Convention
 Monitor
 Topic
 #
 Rating
 Correct
 Wrong
 Stamp
 PNR Ref
 PNR Req
 Blank PNRs
 HJ
 Vote
 Pred
 @
 FM Alert
 FM Approval
 Pvt

RailCal app

site support

हम उस देश के वासी हैं, जिस देश में Shiv Ganga दौड़ती है

Search Forum
<<prev entry    next entry>>
Blog Entry# 2210809
Posted: Mar 25 2017 (20:50)

12 Responses
Last Response: Mar 28 2017 (14:08)
Rail News
6539 views
1

Other News
Mar 25 2017 (20:10)   Bengaluru-Hassan direct train to be flagged off on Monday

Jayashree^   51390 news posts
Entry# 2210809   News Entry# 297616         Tags   Past Edits
The service, which will be flagged off by Union Railway Minister Suresh Prabhu, will take three hours to cover the distance.
Bengaluru:...

7 Posts

3106 views
0

Mar 26 2017 (14:55)
shashikbh
shashikbh   69 blog posts
Re# 2210809-8              
Boss, even 2 hrs reduction in the journey time is a big saving especially who have to go to work on a Monday morning
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

3174 views
0

Mar 26 2017 (15:00)
FraudsterConman
FraudsterConman   7672 blog posts
Re# 2210809-9              
Yes u are right alternative alignment of HAS MAJN section was there but the old MG route was hurriedly made BG. The alignment of this route was proposed from Kabakaputtur to Sakhleshpur without touching SBHR. But SBHR temple is a sacred place, hence plan was dropped. Bus lobby played important role in forcing SWR to follow MG alignment for BG route while another alignment survey from SBHR to MYS directly bye passing HAS didn't see the daylight on it. Alternative MAJN HAS route byepassing Shiradi Ghats is a must
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

2939 views
0

Mar 26 2017 (15:39)
Andhra boy   3434 blog posts
Re# 2210809-10              
elections are near...may be those trains will start soon
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

2927 views
0

Mar 27 2017 (08:31)
A2Z~
A2Z~   17505 blog posts
Re# 2210809-11              
2 hour journey reduction for a 11:45hrs journey is an appreciable reduction. Reporters always try to exaggerate the fact.
The fact which is worth giving thought is, just to fulfil wish/vested-interest of a person to quickly complete the GC in his tenure, the work was done hazardly, bypassing the norms and are people are paying the price of lack of professionalism to the working of IR and continue to do so.
-
It
...
more...
would have been better if GC was completed with adoption of BG standards even if delayed by a few years. Had the norms been followed during GC, the journey would have been extremely convenient and less than 8 hours long as compared to 12 hrs today and capacity & traffic carried by this route too would have been much higher than what is at present. We would have seen atleast 3 overnight trains on the SBC-MAQ-MAO/ERS route which could have very conveniently connected SBC with coastal Karnataka & Kerala.

Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

2758 views
0

Mar 28 2017 (14:08)
SingleTraveller^~
SingleTraveller^~   3247 blog posts
Re# 2210809-12               Past Edits
"fulfill the political agenda (of the then RM) to complete GC of all MG routes of Karnataka within 5 years." -------- You sound "very similar" in your comments with another member ---- point 4 of
/blog/post/2062090 Both had this problem with Karnataka undergoing GC, the other member had problems with Rajasthan getting GC too.
-
If an RM did a good job
...
more...
in completing a work then it is "political agenda"????
Converting MG to BG and integrating many parts of the country to others was the need of the hour and they did it. There is no proof that it was carried out poorly. One can understand hatred towards certain political parties, but downright accusations against certain RMs is unwarranted.
-
The problem is not the entire stretch of Hassan-Mangaluru, its only between SKLR-SBHR because that section comprises of Shirdi ghat - one of the steepest ghat of the country. Other sections have decent MPS, so without this understanding don't just comment on conversion standards.
-
And don't attribute entire conversions to one RM and blame him for all the woes. The section where the problem of ghat lies was converted from 1996-2006. So that RM was not in the office during that period. You can refer to this /blog/post/2066155 and /blog/post/2066155 where Mr. DSP Anirudh and Mr. Sourav have spoken about it.
-

Translate to English
Translate to Hindi
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom
Go to Desktop site
Important Note: This website NEVER solicits for Money or Donations. Please beware of anyone requesting/demanding money on behalf of IRI. Thanks.
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.
India Rail Info Privacy Policy