Search Forum
Blog Entry# 2285630
Posted: May 21 2017 (09:56)
3 Responses
Last Response: May 23 2017 (17:08)
3 Responses
Last Response: May 23 2017 (17:08)
As we know Konkan Railway is approximately 750 kms long, surrounded with mountains, tunnels and bridges though this route has many high speed trains which are capable of running with 55+ avg speed whereas we have Tapti line which is almost 70% completed with doubling though trains takes 6:30-7 hours to reach Surat from Bhusaval without any mountains tunnels, it is possible that trains can reach in 5:30-6 hours without doubling but this tapti line is always neglected by IR.
Do you think Tapti line is not properly managed or neglected by IR?
Do you think Tapti line is not properly managed or neglected by IR?
What's the relation between KR line and Tapti line? Couldn't you just ask direct question on Tapti line?
The reason behind mentioning KR is that the way KR is managed by IR even with hardship on route.
There are many reasons for the higher speed on KR as compared to ST-BSL
(1) ST-BSL track layout was fixed about a century ago, for MG route when the max. operational speed of trains of BG route was just 60kmph. It was in-fact 67kmph till the first wave of MG SF trains Pink City, Vaigai, Ashram etc with 90/100 kmph were introduced in late 1970s. More over rudimentary tunneling & bridge technology available at that time led to relatively poorer track design/ geometry.
(2) KR way laid in 1990s for BG train...
more...
(1) ST-BSL track layout was fixed about a century ago, for MG route when the max. operational speed of trains of BG route was just 60kmph. It was in-fact 67kmph till the first wave of MG SF trains Pink City, Vaigai, Ashram etc with 90/100 kmph were introduced in late 1970s. More over rudimentary tunneling & bridge technology available at that time led to relatively poorer track design/ geometry.
(2) KR way laid in 1990s for BG train...
more...