NCR - maar bhi, raftaar bhi - Harshit Sharma

.
Incorrect Statement : 1. PQ exhausts PQWL of the same PQ Quota (X for X not Y), primarily
Correct Statement : There is no X and Y for PQ, one train has only 1 single PQ that runs from starting station to ending station. Go to the train and check this on the reservation chart.
.
Incorrect...
more...

Statement : 2. After allocation of PQ, RL, RS in their respective Quota, if berth remains vacant, system automatically prioritize it for GNWL before any other quota.
Correct Statement : This statement is itself not correct grammatically, no one can make sense what is being talked here.
.
Incorrect Statement 3 : If PQ Quota has been allocated to start-end journey, that simply means two or more in-between-route PQ has been exhausted to make full route clearance, provided the PQ has cleared WL in their respective Quotas & sill vacant berth is available.
Correct Statement : There are no 2 or more PQ in a train, there is one single PQ that runs from end to end. Go to the train and check this personally. Ask some TTE in the train.
.
Incorrect Statement 4 : Berth for NDLS Mirzapur PQ (S4-21) & Mirzapur PNBE (S4-21) PQ can easily be same, as the seat getting empty from last pool is been assigned to the very next pool!!!!!!
Correct Statement : There is no first and last pool, there is no Mirzapur pool. PQ is end to end quota, one single. Just scan some reservation charts at a junction near you and verify. Now since PQ is end to end, obviously any station to any station passenger can “fit” into that quota.
.
My simple question to you is did you understand what PQ is or are you still struggling to get the basic concept? If not just go through blog 28909 and get more inputs.
.
Whatever you have said in the end that if someone from PQ cancels his ticket, the GNRAC improves is correct in certain scenarios. I have already highlighted those scenarios in my blog 28909. But thats not always. If you say that always GNRAC advances, then PQWL will never move.