Spotting
 Timeline
 Travel Tip
 Trip
 Race
 Social
 Greeting
 Poll
 Img
 PNR
 Pic
 Blog
 News
 Conf TL
 RF Club
 Convention
 Monitor
 Topic
 #
 Rating
 Correct
 Wrong
 Stamp
 PNR Ref
 PNR Req
 Blank PNRs
 HJ
 Vote
 Pred
 @
 FM Alert
 FM Approval
 Pvt

RailCal app

site support

प्रयागराज एक्सप्रेस - जो भी हो तुम खुदा की कसम; लाजवाब हो

Search Forum
<<prev entry    next entry>>
Blog Entry# 2996436
Posted: Jan 12 2018 (22:32)

11 Responses
Last Response: Jan 13 2018 (17:14)
1 Followers
Poll
14105 views
37 votes
0

Jan 12 2018 (22:32)  
Ninad~
Ninad~   385 blog posts
Entry# 2996436              
Should IR restart the manufacturing of wap4
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi
NO vote
Yes
30%
11
No
70%
26

6 Posts

2020 views
0

Jan 13 2018 (16:31)
TheMadrasMail~
TheMadrasMail~   6349 blog posts
Re# 2996436-7              
Manufacturing them is unnecessary. The technology behind them, while capable, has reached its limits and there isn't much scope for improvement,and there is no point in setting up production line to manufacture them again.
What should be done however, is retrofitting all the existing WAP4 locomotives, or a subset of them that still have a lot of codal life left, with latest features like Microprocessor control, Head-on Generation, disc brakes, TPWS etc. Most of the WAP4's still have more than 20 years of operational life left. While the traction cannot be improved much, at least their operational capabilities should be enhanced to support better signalling and advanced rolling stock.
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

1955 views
0

Jan 13 2018 (16:43)
Ninad~
Ninad~   385 blog posts
Re# 2996436-8              
Cute and old also 😞😞😞
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

2007 views
0

Jan 13 2018 (16:49)
Ninad~
Ninad~   385 blog posts
Re# 2996436-9              
Yes it can be done renaming or rebuilding old locos with better feature
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

1995 views
0

Jan 13 2018 (17:04)
Ninad~
Ninad~   385 blog posts
Re# 2996436-10              
Your point is right but it's not unnecessary manufacturing P4 as P7 and p5 are not given to shed which really need it
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

1990 views
1

Jan 13 2018 (17:14)
TheMadrasMail~
TheMadrasMail~   6349 blog posts
Re# 2996436-11              
It is unnecessary, Sir. Tap changer technology in the P1/P4 locos has reached the end of line a long time ago. There is no active development of this technology anymore and the world has moved on to 3 phase locomotives. 3 Phase locomotives are the next step and there is no use of investing a lot of money to manufacture all the Tap changer locos again. The money is better invested in resolving the technical issues with the 3 phasers and upgrading the existing fleet of tap changers.
With the kind of speeds we have in the country now, there is nothing like a shed 'needing' WAP7 or WAP5. Only NR/NCR and probably WR have some claim
...
more...
to 'needing' WAP5's due to them having high speed routes. Locomotive usage in the country is still driven by Loco availability and not the loco's features. So, it doesn't matter which shed gets a P7 and which doesn't. It matters a bit for the P5, but considering that no other zones have high speed sections, here too, the allotment does not matter much.

Translate to English
Translate to Hindi
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom
Go to Desktop site
Important Note: This website NEVER solicits for Money or Donations. Please beware of anyone requesting/demanding money on behalf of IRI. Thanks.
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.
India Rail Info Privacy Policy