Gujarat Mail - as good as Undhiyu

1. Karnataka has many branch lines unlike kerala, where a single train in almost any route ends up covering 50% of kerala. KA has not got proper intra connections, which is being accomodated.
2. KA already has connections to Kerala-three days bangalore weekly, Island daily, GR for three days,KCVL SBC Daily,YPR UBL weekly and KCVL YPR ACSF. So, another train will be naturally accomodated after their needs are satisfied.
3. Slot interchange between kerala trains can be made for early arrivals. Kochi has early arrival slot while capital city of TVC doesn't have....
more...

Why is that so? Thats because Kochi is the major city in Kerala. So, if this SBC has no room for kerala is to be publicised then Kerala has no priority for TVC should also raise a question since TVC SBC will cover Kochi as well.
4. Lobby will exist in any route,which cannot be neglected: that could also be a reason.
5. Even intra connection giving train of KAWR SBC is going to Kannur as a slip; So does that make a sense? Bangalore can say Kerala snatched Karnataka train?
Through various angles, demand for a train to any place from any place is different and it does exist. Trains which are existing may not be enough but there is a limitation in slots,infrastructure,etc....
.
TVC SBC SC/SMET/BJP or something like that can be tried with maintenance at KErala so that KA also gets an intra connection and Kerala gets SBC connection... if at all a new train should come at any cost. Again, maintanence should be at KL and slot should be favouring a no_congestion at SBC side.
Moreover, KA will and should and need to prioritize intra KA connections. Will any state neglect its intra state demands for an inter state demand?
Rather than looking at a same angle, kindly see from different angles. Not meant for a particular person. We should see from different angles to get proper solutions just like a X-Y train caters not only X- to Y- but also the intermediates.