Search Forum
Blog Entry# 3579754
Posted: Jun 27 2018 (21:01)
4 Responses
Last Response: Jun 27 2018 (22:17)
4 Responses
Last Response: Jun 27 2018 (22:17)
Suggestion to modify the operation of 22651/52 (MAS-POY-PGT SF EXP).
1. To run 22651/52 as MS/TBM-VM-MV-KMU-TPJ-DG-POY-PGT; Right now from MAS to POY, PGT it is taking a long run. MAS-SA-DG and MS/TBM-Main line-DG is almost same distance; By rerouting, mainline towns get connection to Palani, Pollachi and Palakkad. (Speed up needed from DG-PGT).
2. Assuming 12651/52 being rerouted, to serve Namakkal, Karur everyday, an SF Exp between MAS-SA-NMKL-KRR-DG-MDU can be operated in the current TT of 22651/52.
P.S:...
more...
1. To run 22651/52 as MS/TBM-VM-MV-KMU-TPJ-DG-POY-PGT; Right now from MAS to POY, PGT it is taking a long run. MAS-SA-DG and MS/TBM-Main line-DG is almost same distance; By rerouting, mainline towns get connection to Palani, Pollachi and Palakkad. (Speed up needed from DG-PGT).
2. Assuming 12651/52 being rerouted, to serve Namakkal, Karur everyday, an SF Exp between MAS-SA-NMKL-KRR-DG-MDU can be operated in the current TT of 22651/52.
P.S:...
more...
ENDED
NO vote
Both Option 1 and 2 are Good
100%
3
Option 1 only is Good
0%
0
Option 2 only is Good
0%
0
Both Options are Not Possible
0%
0
its 22651/2. 12651 is TNSK. MDU MAS new SF came means. NMKL KRR can use that leaving PLNI MAS for TBM.
Thank you buddy, updated. Yes, thats what I was thinking too. Palani connected via temple towns in Mainline then to Chennai, would be more useful. Moreover it would take the same time as of now from DG.
If NMKL KRR got compensation then diversion wont be issue. but if PLNI mas alone diverted then NMKL KRR people will suffer.
Thats true, thats why have suggested the second option. Actually only NMKL would get affected. Atleast KRR has MAQ-MS Exp.