Search Forum
PNR Entry# 827888
Posted: Aug 14 2013 (19:08)
8 Responses
Last Response: Aug 15 2013 (20:11)
8 Responses
Last Response: Aug 15 2013 (20:11)
PREDICTIONS: 31
Journey: Thu Aug 15, 2013
Dep: SC/Secunderabad Junction @ 18:40 PF#: 5,6
Arr: VKI/Venkatagiri @ 05:19 +1 night
Distance: 678 km / 735 km
Class: Sleeper - SL | Tot Seats: Avbl-0072# | Charting @14:35
12764/Padmavathi SF Express (PT)Dep: SC/Secunderabad Junction @ 18:40 PF#: 5,6
Arr: VKI/Venkatagiri @ 05:19 +1 night
Distance: 678 km / 735 km
Class: Sleeper - SL | Tot Seats: Avbl-0072# | Charting @14:35
PNR: 480-xxxxxxx | Similar PNRs
Entry# 827888
NO PENDING REQUEST
Posted: Aug 14 2013 (19:08:21) View Posted Status
Latest Status: Aug 15 2013 (20:12:07)
Passenger 1: EX1,5/Coach Position:15 (Booking Status: W/L 36,CK)Chart PREPARED
3 Posts
Agreed... i have noticed CKWL for trains originating from PUNE is hard to confirm compared to other zones
Earlier CR used to clear CK ahead of all obviously because of revenue factor and this was proposed in RB by Subodh Jain then GM of CR, This was followed across IR until recently the change came where CK was to be denied priority when extra coaches are attached,
However still this does not seems to be uniformally practiced over entire IR...
However still this does not seems to be uniformally practiced over entire IR...
yes sir, there was a court case in MP filled by an ordinary citizen, the courted ruled against railways that giving priority to CKWL when adding extracoach is unfair to GNWL passengers and asked railways to scrap the benefit given to CKWL.
but does not seem the case here
but does not seem the case here
hello satish can u please please predict my ticket with entry#828533