Search Forum
PNR Entry# 1336711
Posted: Jan 10 2015 (23:14)
14 Responses
Last Response: Jan 11 2015 (16:43)
14 Responses
Last Response: Jan 11 2015 (16:43)
Journey: Sun Jan 11, 2015
Dep: LTT/Mumbai LTT @ 05:23 PF#: 2
Arr: VGLJ/VGL Jhansi Junction @ 22:10
Distance: 1115 km / 1680 km
Class: Sleeper - SL | Tot Seats: Avbl-0032# | Charting @22:30
20103/Mumbai LTT - Gorakhpur SF Express (Via Kanpur) (PT)Dep: LTT/Mumbai LTT @ 05:23 PF#: 2
Arr: VGLJ/VGL Jhansi Junction @ 22:10
Distance: 1115 km / 1680 km
Class: Sleeper - SL | Tot Seats: Avbl-0032# | Charting @22:30
PNR: 823-xxxxxxx | Similar PNRs
Entry# 1336711
NO PENDING REQUEST
Posted: Jan 10 2015 (23:14:06) View Posted Status
Latest Status: Jan 11 2015 (16:57:03)
Passenger 1: SX1,2/Coach Position:6 (Booking Status: W/L 64,CK)Chart PREPARED
9 Posts
If pt was avl then why provided in extra coach. I mean if sx1 would have not been attached then was therr any possibilty of it remaining in WL. pls comment
Mght b it is posible
Xtra coach alrdy is thre
Nd with xtra coach pt seay will count
Just a viewpoint
Mght b i m wrong
Xtra coach alrdy is thre
Nd with xtra coach pt seay will count
Just a viewpoint
Mght b i m wrong
extra coach in dis train iz done at d tym of charting itself ......... i m sure !!
wat happens may b, starting few seats in extra coach lyk 3-6 berths r allocated to CK passengers,
dis can b a possibility !!
wat happens may b, starting few seats in extra coach lyk 3-6 berths r allocated to CK passengers,
dis can b a possibility !!
One thing is for sure, this is confirmed due to unused pt seats. Pt was 46 avl and my tkt was CKWL 44. if pt was not avl then they would have neglected this because even CKWL 1,2,3 of certain trains do not cnf. Also in extra coach first priority would have been normal GNWL. In this case they mifht have decided to allot few berths of Ckwl who comes within tje range of unused pt
yes very true
If there is no xtra coach
Thn 1st priorty to xtra coach is gnwl,pqwl
If there is no xtra coach
Thn 1st priorty to xtra coach is gnwl,pqwl