Search Forum
PNR Entry# 1498584
Posted: Jun 03 2015 (21:03)
12 Responses
Last Response: Jun 18 2015 (13:49)
12 Responses
Last Response: Jun 18 2015 (13:49)
Journey: Wed Jun 17, 2015
Dep: SC/Secunderabad Junction @ 16:15 PF#: 5
Arr: TPTY/Tirupati @ 06:25 +1 night
Distance: 800 km / 800 km
Class: AC 3-tier - 3A | Tot Seats: Avbl-0152# | Charting @12:15
12732/Secunderabad - Tirupati SF ExpressDep: SC/Secunderabad Junction @ 16:15 PF#: 5
Arr: TPTY/Tirupati @ 06:25 +1 night
Distance: 800 km / 800 km
Class: AC 3-tier - 3A | Tot Seats: Avbl-0152# | Charting @12:15
PNR: 440-xxxxxxx | Similar PNRs
Entry# 1498584
NO PENDING REQUEST
Posted: Jun 03 2015 (21:03:31) View Posted Status
Latest Status: Jun 18 2015 (14:25:42)
Passenger 2: B2,31 [SL]/Coach Position:6 (Booking Status: B2,31,GN)Passenger 3: B2,29 [MB]/Coach Position:6 (Booking Status: B2,29,GN)
Chart PREPARED
7 Posts
I do not understand how IR/SCR planned this train and how they could continue to run the train with so late all the time. No measures also by SCR to improve the punctuality. When they have so many rakes for running special trains.. why cannot they make Padmavati daily and allocate a different rake for this train? I do not understand the logic of SCR sometimes... :)
padmavati maintenance is at SC,to make padmavati daily they should allot sc-tpty sf via rc with new rake,maintenance is the issue
Even for Krmr-Tpty SC div has inaugrated Seven hills as MP of Karimnagar demanded SC div for Karimnagar tpty
The main prob is both tpty,SC,KCG and HYB are running short of day mainteance time and facilities like pit line availabilty.
Even for Krmr-Tpty SC div has inaugrated Seven hills as MP of Karimnagar demanded SC div for Karimnagar tpty
The main prob is both tpty,SC,KCG and HYB are running short of day mainteance time and facilities like pit line availabilty.
They should construct couple of pitlines as they have sufficient land at so many stations like Sanatnagar, Hafizpet, Lingampalli, Moulali..