Search Forum
Blog Entry# 647592
Posted: Jan 21 2013 (13:03)
12 Responses
Last Response: Jan 22 2013 (10:17)
12 Responses
Last Response: Jan 22 2013 (10:17)
Jan 21 2013 (13:03) 12649/Karnataka Sampark Kranti Express (Via Ballari) (PT)
s5sahil~
s5sahil~ 13529 blog postsIs this the fastest timing between JHS-AGC? 2 hrs 20 mins FLAT !!!
Avg. Speed of 92.5Km/hr that means KSK covered JHS-GWL (98kms) in 65 mins and GWL-AGC (120kms) in 75 mins.
.
Leave TN's, Shaan-e-Bhopal's and Duronto's Even King BPL shatabdi takes 2hrs 30 mins.
KSK...
more...
Avg. Speed of 92.5Km/hr that means KSK covered JHS-GWL (98kms) in 65 mins and GWL-AGC (120kms) in 75 mins.
.
Leave TN's, Shaan-e-Bhopal's and Duronto's Even King BPL shatabdi takes 2hrs 30 mins.
KSK...
more...
7 Posts
yes, i have feel sometimes like so, its all about software multiplexing, thnks fr these description :)
Couldn't get the meaning of Software multipexing in this context. This is plain manipulation with operation system data.
i can understand for horrible errors but when a train covers a certain distance by taking 10-20 mins less than scheduled time than it is purely a performance based run rather than adjudicating it as a system error. Im sure error do happen like you have pointed out, but this practice cant be a everyday thing.
If Train enquiry can do horrible errors then how can you rely on the same for precise timing to the resolution of 10-20 minutes? And please trust me I have always seen fudging of at least 15-30 minutes in case of timings for bigger stations. I travel a lot in NDLS to ALD sector and have seen that although train (prayagraj) reaches ALD by 7:15 or 7:20 but is still updated as reaching right time at 6:45 for ALD. Now using this if I compute the speed then I am sure to get a handsome number capable enough to beat even the BPL shatabdi.
Also to note that if timing for Fatehpur in my screen shot would have been 5
:30 AM then we would have got a handsome speed of more than 100Km/hr and would have claimed that to be a fantastic run instead of agreeing that it is fudgedd data.
:30 AM then we would have got a handsome speed of more than 100Km/hr and would have claimed that to be a fantastic run instead of agreeing that it is fudgedd data.