Search Forum
PNR Entry# 830332
Posted: Aug 18 2013 (04:14)
8 Responses
Last Response: Aug 18 2013 (04:51)
8 Responses
Last Response: Aug 18 2013 (04:51)
Journey: Fri Oct 11, 2013
Dep: DLI/Old Delhi Junction @ 06:15 PF#: 11,16
Arr: ASN/Asansol Junction @ 04:31 +1 night
Distance: 1247 km / 1715 km
Class: AC 2-tier - 2A | Tot Seats: Avbl-0023# | Charting @02:15
12312/Netaji ExpressDep: DLI/Old Delhi Junction @ 06:15 PF#: 11,16
Arr: ASN/Asansol Junction @ 04:31 +1 night
Distance: 1247 km / 1715 km
Class: AC 2-tier - 2A | Tot Seats: Avbl-0023# | Charting @02:15
PNR: 245-xxxxxxx | Similar PNRs
Entry# 830332
NO PENDING REQUEST
Posted: Aug 18 2013 (04:14:28) View Posted Status
Latest Status: Oct 11 2013 (13:43:11)
Passenger 2: Can/Mod (Booking Status: W/L 14,RLGN)Passenger 3: Can/Mod (Booking Status: W/L 15,RLGN)
Chart PREPARED
3 Posts
Someone who can supersearch "RACallocation" is not that much of a layman.
Its not only for the supersearch people, but also for those who randomly browse PNRs.
For those, even the hashtag isn't required. Because its visible in the original status itself. In cases when it appears in the 'Latest status', I agree the number needs to be written, but here its just not required.
I have written dozens of RAC allocations using the above format and I don't change it, whatever be the case. Its a habit for me now.