Search Forum
Blog Entry# 1075987
Posted: Apr 29 2014 (12:17)
13 Responses
Last Response: May 02 2014 (13:00)
13 Responses
Last Response: May 02 2014 (13:00)
For WL PNR tkts, often it appears with two numbers, i.e. GNWL#/WL#, for example GNWL12/WL5. It is suggested more clarity should be made avilable as to whether GNWL nos. 1-7, have been confirmed or not?
8 Posts
first number in original status of wailtlist for that ntrain /class and second number wil 5 id current waitlist number . 12-5 , is 7 person have eitehr moved to racor confm or cancled , any of the optin, it need not be 1`,2, 3, up to 7 , it can be PAX 1, 4, 5 , 6 7 , 10 ,11 or any order
When I booked my tkt ,my PNR No. 6626003985, indicated,Passenger 1cnf and 3 WL as WL 1,2,& 3.Presently it indicates, two Confirmed AC I berths and WL 2and 3, out of the 4 tkts booked under the same PNR, based on your response, it should have be confirmed, as WL 1, which was mine has already been cnfd. as indicated above. However, it still indicates in the site, on PNR Query as WL 1 and 2. Pl let me know why the status updation as CNF, is not being reflected when the presenr status of WL is WL 13 /WL 6. Shall appreciate a clear cnf status note.
Out of 4 PAX bkd under one PNR, it reflected PAX 1 as CNF & others as WL 1,2and3. Subsequently PAX 2 got Cnfd and other 2 PAX was being shown as WL1& 2. Presently, WL status is WL6/WL13. However PNR Query still reflects WL 1 and 2 under my above reffered PNR. Shall appreciate a claer cnf status being reflected in PNR query status. Class of travel is AC 1.