Search Forum
Blog Entry# 1192275
Posted: Aug 20 2014 (05:39)
51 Responses
Last Response: Aug 24 2014 (09:39)
51 Responses
Last Response: Aug 24 2014 (09:39)
In India how childish can people or for that matter even railfans become. And what small and myopic mentality they exhibit when they crib like this.
> Why no WAP 7 passing through my home station/district/state/zone
> Why no Rajdhani passing through my home station/district/state/zone
> Why no Shatabdi passing through my home station/district/state/zone
>...
more...
> Why no WAP 7 passing through my home station/district/state/zone
> Why no Rajdhani passing through my home station/district/state/zone
> Why no Shatabdi passing through my home station/district/state/zone
>...
more...
29 Public Posts - Wed Aug 20, 2014
3 Public Posts - Thu Aug 21, 2014
Definitelt TVC would have got , there is no doubt in that , Infact TVC should have a daily Raj compared to MAS as MAS is somewhat well served to by a handful of trains , the problem arised because MAS lost GNWL when it was extended to TVC. MAS got very less seats that time. Moreover the Rajdhani coaches were facing a huge demand like our present LHB scenario as every state was demanding a Rajdhani. I feel SR became chennai centric only few years back. Previously SR mainly focussed on KL compared to TN and KA (during 1990 to 2000). only after SA division formation things changed .
10 Public Posts - Thu Aug 21, 2014
6 Public Posts - Fri Aug 22, 2014
1 Public Posts - Sat Aug 23, 2014
1 Public Posts - Sun Aug 24, 2014