Search Forum
Blog Entry# 1350911
Posted: Jan 25 2015 (11:14)
12 Responses
Last Response: Jan 25 2015 (18:58)
12 Responses
Last Response: Jan 25 2015 (18:58)
Jan 25 2015 (11:14) 12533/Pushpak Express (PT) | CSTM/Mumbai CSM Terminus (18 PFs)
Tridib Chakraborty
Tridib Chakraborty 1223 blog postsHad an awsome ride on 17618 Tapovan Express from Lasalgaon to Mumbai CST yesterday.
.
Waiting at LS, Pushpak SF passed at 5.20 pm... running 1.5 hours behind schedule. My Tapovan was running late by 20 mins. Soon we caugh up with Pushpak at Igatpuri where the NER crack SF was having its customary BSL WAP4 replaced by KYN WCAM3. I had a feeling we will proceed earlier as we don't have a halt at Kasara and Pushpak needs brakers (locomotives at front for braking while descending the ghats).
....
more...
.
Waiting at LS, Pushpak SF passed at 5.20 pm... running 1.5 hours behind schedule. My Tapovan was running late by 20 mins. Soon we caugh up with Pushpak at Igatpuri where the NER crack SF was having its customary BSL WAP4 replaced by KYN WCAM3. I had a feeling we will proceed earlier as we don't have a halt at Kasara and Pushpak needs brakers (locomotives at front for braking while descending the ghats).
....
more...
8 Public Posts - Sun Jan 25, 2015
During morning hours complete priority is with EMU's n that cannot be compared :)
Looking at dep time of Pushpak from MMR i dont think LC of Tapovan would have happened by then
Agreed that Tapovan was on time but best interests of both the trains seems to have been considered here, In the end both trains didn't loose much time... :)
Looking at dep time of Pushpak from MMR i dont think LC of Tapovan would have happened by then
Agreed that Tapovan was on time but best interests of both the trains seems to have been considered here, In the end both trains didn't loose much time... :)
3 Public Posts - Sun Jan 25, 2015