Spotting
 Timeline
 Travel Tip
 Trip
 Race
 Social
 Greeting
 Poll
 Img
 PNR
 Pic
 Blog
 News
 Conf TL
 RF Club
 Convention
 Monitor
 Topic
 #
 Rating
 Correct
 Wrong
 Stamp
 PNR Ref
 PNR Req
 Blank PNRs
 HJ
 Vote
 Pred
 @
 FM Alert
 FM Approval
 Pvt

RailCal app

site support

এক রাজ্য, দুই রাণী।নাম তাদের, শালিমার ও আলিপুরদুয়ার রাজ্যরানী - Dip

Search Forum
<<prev entry    next entry>>
Blog Entry# 1350911
Posted: Jan 25 2015 (11:14)

12 Responses
Last Response: Jan 25 2015 (18:58)
General Travel
6635 views
6

Jan 25 2015 (11:14)   12533/Pushpak Express (PT) | CSTM/Mumbai CSM Terminus (18 PFs)
 
Tridib Chakraborty
Tridib Chakraborty   1223 blog posts
Entry# 1350911            Tags   Past Edits
Had an awsome ride on 17618 Tapovan Express from Lasalgaon to Mumbai CST yesterday.
.
Waiting at LS, Pushpak SF passed at 5.20 pm... running 1.5 hours behind schedule. My Tapovan was running late by 20 mins. Soon we caugh up with Pushpak at Igatpuri where the NER crack SF was having its customary BSL WAP4 replaced by KYN WCAM3. I had a feeling we will proceed earlier as we don't have a halt at Kasara and Pushpak needs brakers (locomotives at front for braking while descending the ghats).
.
...
more...

But to my surprise, Pushpak was given the go ahead. But soon we also followed it on the up line (There are 3 tracks between IGP and Kasara.... Up, down and reverse line..... Soon we had a parallel run with Pushpak at the Thull ghats ..... was a memorable incident as we both halted (customary brake checking) and started simultaneously.
Soon, just before Kasara at the last tunnel, Pushpak was detained and we overtook it.
Couple of points regarding this...
1) I assume Pushpak needs brakers being a 24 coacher hence has a stop at Kasara (CR railfans please clarify).... so we were allowed to proceed ahead (we reached CSTM at 10.20 pm while Pushpak reached at 10.40 pm).
2) Though both are non CR trains, it was bit of a weird controlling. Why Pushpak overtook us at MMR (Tapovan had a halt of 30 mins including loco change) if we were to eventually proceed ahead? We could have easily be on time if were not detained at Manmad Jn.
3) My first thought was that if this had happened in NCR, we all would have cursed the controllers. This proves, there are many constraints, parameters, that we railfans don't understand and blindly blame certain zones without actually realizing the nitty grities of section controlling.

Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

3 Public Posts - Sun Jan 25, 2015

1788 views
0

Jan 25 2015 (11:57)
Tridib Chakraborty   1223 blog posts
Re# 1350911-6              
But then we did catch up with it and overtook it at Kasara.
.
My point is, if Pushpak is already 1.5 hours late, it has lost its slot.... just like Punjab Mail (infact CR's own train) loses its slot in the morning as is overtaken even by the EMUs..... Tapovan was on time at Manmad.... should have proceeded before 12533. In this case, Pushpak would have been late (already late) but Tapovan had a greater chance of reaching CSTM before 10 pm.
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

8 Public Posts - Sun Jan 25, 2015
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom
Go to Desktop site
Important Note: This website NEVER solicits for Money or Donations. Please beware of anyone requesting/demanding money on behalf of IRI. Thanks.
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.
India Rail Info Privacy Policy