Spotting
 Timeline
 Travel Tip
 Trip
 Race
 Social
 Greeting
 Poll
 Img
 PNR
 Pic
 Blog
 News
 Conf TL
 RF Club
 Convention
 Monitor
 Topic
 #
 Rating
 Correct
 Wrong
 Stamp
 PNR Ref
 PNR Req
 Blank PNRs
 HJ
 Vote
 Pred
 @
 FM Alert
 FM Approval
 Pvt

RailCal app

site support

Tamil Nadu Express - எங்கள் உயிர் துடிப்பு - Vijay Baradwaj

Search Forum
<<prev entry    next entry>>
Blog Entry# 1590235
Posted: Sep 14 2015 (16:46)

21 Responses
Last Response: Sep 16 2015 (16:27)
General Travel
25602 views
10

Sep 14 2015 (16:46)   12805/Visakhapatnam - Lingampalli Janmabhoomi SF Express (PT) | VSKP/Visakhapatnam Junction (8 PFs)
 
suryajohny~
suryajohny~   0 blog posts
Entry# 1590235            Tags   Past Edits
I have lodged a GRIEVANCE in PG Portal on dated 27.09.2013.
Registration Number : MORLY/E/2013/07810
Name Of Complainant : suryanarayana rao BH
Date of Receipt : 27 Sep 2013
Received by : Ministry of Railways, ( Railway Board)
Forwarded
...
more...
to : Exec.director/T &C
Officer name : ED/T&C
Officer Designation : Exec.Director/Tourism and Cate
Contact Address : Exec.Director/Tourism and Catering
Ministry of Railway
Railway Board.110001
Contact Number : 23388461
Grievance Description : 12805/12806 ICE Janmabhoomi operated by Ecor from VSKP-SC covering a distance of 687KM with an average speed of 54KM/Hr with 17halts and 12hrs 30 min journey time looks like the longest day time train.The train was initially introduced in the year 2002 between VSKP to BZA and subsequently extended to Tenali to avoid huge turn around time at BZA. But it was extended to SC via TENALI and GNT on 1st July 2007 terminating Nagarjuna express between Tenali and SC operated by SCR. Now two full fledged rakes are operated between SC to VSKP by Ecor hauled by WDM-4 KJM power independently.The rake has 8-UR,2-SLR,11-D and 2-C coaches totaling to 23 coaches. It is an intercity running since 2007 without a pantry car and some coaches are not vestibule.The similar ICE trains running between VSKP-BZA Ratnachal,SC-BZA Satavahana,BZA-MAS Pinakini and SC-GNT ICE and SC-KRNT having different paths operated by SCR are all having PANTRY cars fully vestibule except Janmabhoomi.Except JB all other trains mentioned above cover under less than 400km using single rake.ICEs are meant to cover the distance under shortest time very quickly and return back to base for good primary maintenance.But JB is a jam packed train and vendors rush into coaches along with passengers create ruckus,inconvenience to the de-boarding passengers leading to many un warranted accidents.During summer season it is very difficult to get drinking water and vendors charge exorbitant rates for eatables from passengers.So providing a PANTRY CAR is very much essential as it is being deliberately delayed by concerned authorities for so many years on the grounds that no body is quoting for contract at Zonal level which is ridiculous. In view of the above it is suggested to 1).Cause instructions to Ecor to completely hand over the rakes(23 coaches) to SCR which has a provision for one spare coach to attach a i.e. pantry car.2). Please spare 2 pantry coaches to JB specifically and directly to WAT/Ecor as Ecor/Operating dept/BBS says in response to grievance stating that presently, it is not possible to add pantry car service to the train No. 18519/18520 VSKP-LTT Bi-weekly S/F Express due to shortage of Pantry Car in stock in East Coast Railway. However, your suggestion will be kept in mind while augmenting infrastructure.This grievance is lodged in the larger interest of public to avoid frequent accidents and many fatalities are reported over a period of time and also to avoid exploiting by vendors,unhygienic food items and other un-authorized persons frequently entering compartments thereby disrupting the schedule run of the train.Finally it is also requested to ensure that the existing coaches should be replaced with vestibule coaches with bio-toilets for smooth movement of passengers and pantry staff.

Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

16 Posts

4442 views
1

Sep 16 2015 (15:49)
suryajohny~   0 blog posts
Re# 1590235-17              
better i was not replied at the first instance......
now some work on me for further course of action.......
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

4495 views
0

Sep 16 2015 (15:51)
suryajohny~   0 blog posts
Re# 1590235-18              
kindly suggest me for next course of action on the subject matter......
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

4171 views
0

Sep 16 2015 (16:09)
sumanth~   0 blog posts
Re# 1590235-19              
I am sorry,i dont believe in improvements of railways due to these actions,they act like monopoly.
They reply in such a way that always they are positive side and doing good work,else they say we are trying to.................
"Trying to" will never ends....
Its my personal opinion
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

4494 views
0

Sep 16 2015 (16:22)
suryajohny~   0 blog posts
Re# 1590235-20              
so no option.... except to put under carpet.......
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

4146 views
0

Sep 16 2015 (16:27)
sumanth~   0 blog posts
Re# 1590235-21              
There are many which are kept under!!!!!
But no one speaking the role of SCR in not making 24 coacher!!!!
Try to get the output of SCR,eithe it is SCR or ECoR every one is same
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom
Go to Desktop site
Important Note: This website NEVER solicits for Money or Donations. Please beware of anyone requesting/demanding money on behalf of IRI. Thanks.
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.
India Rail Info Privacy Policy