Search Forum
Blog Entry# 1982479
Posted: Sep 06 2016 (07:38)
14 Responses
Last Response: Sep 06 2016 (13:24)
14 Responses
Last Response: Sep 06 2016 (13:24)
9 Posts
Tell me one thing, what prakasam dist got till now after becoming new dist in 1970's till now
i am telling about past history information about guntakal track records in future if its not become railway zone then its waste of time to discuss.
Bitrragunta too has rly land n history that doesnot mean zone should be at bittrangunta
if its already division then we could have supported to you sir.
Since most of the administration already exists and the only place of backward region towards rayalaseema development.
Also bitragunta is not far to new capital city when compare to our region place.
Sir its opinion whoever wish we can accept
Since most of the administration already exists and the only place of backward region towards rayalaseema development.
Also bitragunta is not far to new capital city when compare to our region place.
Sir its opinion whoever wish we can accept
A valid proposal If at all a new zone is formed, then GTL should be the HQ rather than Vizag. Putting up HQ at Vizag week not really add anything of value to the employment opportunities in the region as it already has a large industrial economy.
Putting up in GTL will at least provide more government jobs in this region which is much less industrialised than the coastal regions and is also more drought prone. It may not bring out any magical development, but at least it will be more useful for this region than Vizag or any other place in costal AP.
Putting up in GTL will at least provide more government jobs in this region which is much less industrialised than the coastal regions and is also more drought prone. It may not bring out any magical development, but at least it will be more useful for this region than Vizag or any other place in costal AP.