Search Forum
Blog Entry# 2314643
Posted: Jun 10 2017 (11:39)
21 Responses
Last Response: Jun 12 2017 (18:31)
21 Responses
Last Response: Jun 12 2017 (18:31)
do u support if ir decide to bifurcate current visakhapatnam link (12861) and dakshin (12721) as separate trains?
NO vote
YES IT IS NEEDED SO EXTRA BERTHS CAN AVAILABLE IN BOTH TRAINS AS FULL TRAINS.
82%
27
NO NEED CURRENT TRAIN IS SUFFICIENT AND IN GOOD PATRONAGE
12%
4
CANT SAY
0%
0
MY COMMENT (PLEASE POST IN COMMENTS)
6%
2
17 Posts
Arre this is nothing, yesterday someone claimed that Puru is not getting patronage from PURI, its a flop train and hence should be extended to VSKP😂😂😂
(1) NZM-NGP-Dakshin Express should be made an independent train to serve SC/HYB.
(2) To better connect VSKP,Samalkot, Rajahmundry with Delhi instead of Link Express, a SF AP express on 4 days a week on NDLS-BinaMalkhedi-KatniMurwara-Uslapur(BSP)-R-VSKP -BZA which will shortest route for Delhi-Vizag at just 1775km against 2102km of AC AP express, and cover the distance in about 30-31 hrs instead of 36 hrs of ACSF express.
(3) AP SF express can be introduced on NZM-NGP-BZA-VSKP/Guntur for rest 3 days a week for better connectivity to BZA.
(4)...
more...
(2) To better connect VSKP,Samalkot, Rajahmundry with Delhi instead of Link Express, a SF AP express on 4 days a week on NDLS-BinaMalkhedi-KatniMurwara-Uslapur(BSP)-R-VSKP -BZA which will shortest route for Delhi-Vizag at just 1775km against 2102km of AC AP express, and cover the distance in about 30-31 hrs instead of 36 hrs of ACSF express.
(3) AP SF express can be introduced on NZM-NGP-BZA-VSKP/Guntur for rest 3 days a week for better connectivity to BZA.
(4)...
more...
Train can be introduce but cant name it as AP as only less distance will be covered in AP. but we can keep other name.