Search Forum
Blog Entry# 2894890
Posted: Dec 16 2017 (11:16)
19 Responses
Last Response: Jan 08 2019 (16:26)
19 Responses
Last Response: Jan 08 2019 (16:26)
Good to see Chandrababu supporting Pap-cct line, let's see what happens: Despite not giving a zone, why do you cancel pitapuram- Kakinada line? Ap govt also is a partner and providing land for free. It's shocking to see this 21.5km line which was sanctioned in 1999-2000 to get cancelled in lieu of GM,Scr's letter in 2012
14 Posts
I haven't heard anything about a plan to construct a bypass line at SPV. For the moment, trains are expected to reverse at CCT upon completion of the NS line.
There will be gradient issues if a bypass line is connected before the road-bridge over the CCT-SLO road. I guess, a bypass line will have to bifurcate right after Kovvada and take an alternate alignment and another bridge to join before SPV.
That was why SCR wasn't very interested in this...
more...
There will be gradient issues if a bypass line is connected before the road-bridge over the CCT-SLO road. I guess, a bypass line will have to bifurcate right after Kovvada and take an alternate alignment and another bridge to join before SPV.
That was why SCR wasn't very interested in this...
more...
agreed.. there was never a proposal like that which was indicated by me.. vaste baguntadi antuna.. gradient issues can be answered in a similar fashion that was taken by CCT KLPH line .
Station lo management bro, direct ga effect em Kadu. Slack equations change avtai kada stop add aithe ala ana nenu
My idea : Scr directly wants to start trains from COA/CCT towards Ns rather making multiple passing trains which again go towards Slo regarding kotipalli line, If they give sarpavaram stop most PPL prefer to get down there and loco reversal doesn't effect much or else they can do what they are currently doing with Janmabhoomi express attach a loco at the end at Ns or elsewhere and if there is frequent shuttling engines do not matter between two stations.