दूरी नही मंज़िल भारी, साथ हो जब मेट्रो हमारी - Mushfique Khalid

I am posting few facts.correct me if i m wrong.now if we assume that 12828/12827 is lhbfied,then ser would need only 1reck for this train.now if RNC int is lhbfied along with RSA then 2 recks are required.so, according to me delinking the RSA and lhbfying 12828/12827 is cost saving for ser,as priority train is lhbfied.
2nd.hte CDO has acquired last spot in maintaining lhb recks.so maintaining 2 int lhbfied recks for hte CDO would be problematic.so lhb maintainence would be poor.so again RSA is questionable if lhb maintainence isn't proper.so delinking RSA is most appropriate.
3rd.i...
more...

feel d point made by ser spokesman isn't totally correct .hwh is congested no doubt but can always hold on to an individual reck of 12827/12828.if congestion is the cause then why Shiromani pgr n steel exp rnt having RSA.congesion of int trains then would be min.so congestion just can't be an excuse.
4.long route train s can be destined at SRC allowing SRC to act as a destination stn immidietly.so int trains can reach n leave hwh.int train s having stopage at src would fulfill hwh bound psngrs.
5.rsa in RNC int n prr SF exp isn't allowing cleanliness in both the recks.so even if Swarna coaches come with RSA cleanliness lack will destroy that reck as well.
What r ur views? share