Search Forum
Blog Entry# 4071457
Posted: Dec 05 2018 (18:32)
17 Responses
Last Response: Dec 07 2018 (21:27)
17 Responses
Last Response: Dec 07 2018 (21:27)
AHMEDABAD - Sultanpur. and Ahmedabad - GKP exp .
ko LHB Rake .
.
one more train passing through NWR gets LHB .rake .
ko LHB Rake .
.
one more train passing through NWR gets LHB .rake .
15 Posts
These were just few examples. Many trains from ST,RJT,VRL,BHUJ,BVC are worth LHBfying. I am quite sure that WR would LHBfy GIMB trains first as it comes under ADI Divn. While rest zones are occasionally alloted LHB especially BVC Divn. Parsanath, BVC-BDTS, JAM-BDTS, BDTS-BHUJ AC, Garbha, Kutch, Sayaji, Tapti Ganga, ST-BGP etc. are some trains which should be definitely LHBfied as most have far better patronage than ADI-SLN/GKP Exp.
Trains having less no. of rakes are given priority for LHBfication in most cases. For ADI-SLN/PNBE/GKP, only 2 rakes were required for LHBfying 3 trains hence it got LHB. LHB allocation is not based on patronage
There are many others from RJT which have RSA.(Like OKHA-BSB/JP) Could have alloted LHB to those train. But atleast a LHB rake should be alloted to BVC Divn. Division hokar bhi BVC most neglected hai. Saare LHB ADI, BDTS, MMCT ke traino ko dena, ye sahi baat nahi lagti.