Search Forum
Blog Entry# 4202588
Posted: Jan 20 2019 (16:56)
40 Responses
Last Response: Jan 22 2019 (01:25)
40 Responses
Last Response: Jan 22 2019 (01:25)
Jan 20 2019 (16:56) 22221/Mumbai CSMT - Hazrat Nizamuddin Rajdhani Express
OvaisKhan_2011~
OvaisKhan_2011~ 135 blog postsThis new Rajdhani on CR is not required at all.Instead there should be a normal super fast train or a Humsafar Exp. from Mumbai to Delhi.
Why railways are always taking care of rich persons only and not common man.
Why railways are always taking care of rich persons only and not common man.
35 Posts
Atleast a man can afford that Humsafar instead of Rajdhani.But i m in favour of LHB SF train more.
I don't think so it (HS) would run late.You can see in WR the Likes of swaraj,Paschim,Golden Temple they are running on time.
By giving an AC Exp. or normal super fast train with LHB instead of Rajdhani would help more comman man and not serve only to the rich.
Bookings would be more in this than Rajdhani.
By giving an AC Exp. or normal super fast train with LHB instead of Rajdhani would help more comman man and not serve only to the rich.
Bookings would be more in this than Rajdhani.
Fast Humsafars are not practical..and it will never enjoy priority of Rajdhani in the section and will run late as it will get Priority like SF's at 110
That's true fast Humsafar isn't practical but i m more concerned about the high fares of Rajdhanis.But it would have served more passenger base than Rajdhani.But a punctuality can be maintained even if the train runs at 110.
That depends on CR.
That depends on CR.
I think for faster connection..RAJ is the best choice...even AC SF that runs on NZM-LTT route with 130 MPS can't maintain the punctuality how can we trust HS ...RAJ is better
HS also has flexi fare which at a level makes the fare equal to raj fare.
HS also has flexi fare which at a level makes the fare equal to raj fare.