Search Forum
Blog Entry# 4354197
Posted: Jun 28 2019 (18:11)
8 Responses
Last Response: Jun 29 2019 (11:16)
8 Responses
Last Response: Jun 29 2019 (11:16)
Jun 28 2019 (18:11) 11302/Udyan Express (PT) | MYS/Mysuru Junction (Mysore) (6 PFs)
KhagariaJn^~
KhagariaJn^~ 63504 blog posts
Mp mysuru's letter
***Restoration of daily rail connectivity between Mysuru and Mangalore/Karwar.
***Proposal for extension of services of (link: click here T.No.11301/11302 Chhatrapati Sahu Maharaj Mumbai-KSR Bengaluru City Udyan daily Express to Mysuru.
***Mysuru-Kushalnagar-New Broad Gauge Railway line project. It requires STATE govt’s full support.
***Extending...
more...
***Restoration of daily rail connectivity between Mysuru and Mangalore/Karwar.
***Proposal for extension of services of (link: click here T.No.11301/11302 Chhatrapati Sahu Maharaj Mumbai-KSR Bengaluru City Udyan daily Express to Mysuru.
***Mysuru-Kushalnagar-New Broad Gauge Railway line project. It requires STATE govt’s full support.
***Extending...
more...
3 Posts
This is nothing dakshina Kannada mp asked to fulfill 16+ demands to RM ..still this is less ..more ever pratap simha is not like other mps he never hit & run he will follow up with moR regularly till it gets done ..on August 15th one train likely to get extend to mys ..other mps just show off with letters photo click s with mosR & RM. Never try to follow up ..
What is status of Mangaluru getting into SWR? It still takes time for that one it seems.. Gulbarga Division under SWR is also still a hanging issue.
In one of the letters he himself talks about terminal congestion in Mysuru , but ironically requests for 3 train extensions to Mysuru.
But to be fair to him, at least his letter (whoever has drafted it) mentions platform turnaround time, Primary maintenance etc which is unlike many other letters sent by MP's who merely write about new trains and extensions without even checking if it is possible. Instead of KCVL-SBC at least they could try for ERS-BAND (bi weekly) and KCVL-BAND (Humsafar) which have a much longer layover period at BAND. Earlier when it was proposed, it was rejected by SWR.
But to be fair to him, at least his letter (whoever has drafted it) mentions platform turnaround time, Primary maintenance etc which is unlike many other letters sent by MP's who merely write about new trains and extensions without even checking if it is possible. Instead of KCVL-SBC at least they could try for ERS-BAND (bi weekly) and KCVL-BAND (Humsafar) which have a much longer layover period at BAND. Earlier when it was proposed, it was rejected by SWR.