Search Forum
Blog Entry# 4354197
Posted: Jun 28 2019 (18:11)
8 Responses
Last Response: Jun 29 2019 (11:16)
8 Responses
Last Response: Jun 29 2019 (11:16)
Jun 28 2019 (18:11) 11302/Udyan Express (PT) | MYS/Mysuru Junction (Mysore) (6 PFs)
KhagariaJn^~
KhagariaJn^~ 63504 blog postsMp mysuru's letter
***Restoration of daily rail connectivity between Mysuru and Mangalore/Karwar.
***Proposal for extension of services of (link: click here T.No.11301/11302 Chhatrapati Sahu Maharaj Mumbai-KSR Bengaluru City Udyan daily Express to Mysuru.
***Mysuru-Kushalnagar-New Broad Gauge Railway line project. It requires STATE govt’s full support.
***Extending...
more...
***Restoration of daily rail connectivity between Mysuru and Mangalore/Karwar.
***Proposal for extension of services of (link: click here T.No.11301/11302 Chhatrapati Sahu Maharaj Mumbai-KSR Bengaluru City Udyan daily Express to Mysuru.
***Mysuru-Kushalnagar-New Broad Gauge Railway line project. It requires STATE govt’s full support.
***Extending...
more...
4 Public Posts - Fri Jun 28, 2019
3 Public Posts - Sat Jun 29, 2019
In one of the letters he himself talks about terminal congestion in Mysuru , but ironically requests for 3 train extensions to Mysuru.
But to be fair to him, at least his letter (whoever has drafted it) mentions platform turnaround time, Primary maintenance etc which is unlike many other letters sent by MP's who merely write about new trains and extensions without even checking if it is possible. Instead of KCVL-SBC at least they could try for ERS-BAND (bi weekly) and KCVL-BAND (Humsafar) which have a much longer layover period at BAND. Earlier when it was proposed, it was rejected by SWR.
But to be fair to him, at least his letter (whoever has drafted it) mentions platform turnaround time, Primary maintenance etc which is unlike many other letters sent by MP's who merely write about new trains and extensions without even checking if it is possible. Instead of KCVL-SBC at least they could try for ERS-BAND (bi weekly) and KCVL-BAND (Humsafar) which have a much longer layover period at BAND. Earlier when it was proposed, it was rejected by SWR.