Antyodaya Express: The best a common man can get. - Vikas Kumar

"You taken reference of SB for Hamrapur!! The initial query is for Masagram Jn SB @ Masagram PF meant to connect Bankura not BWN/HWH (for BWN/HWH, SB is just Masagram!!
NTES came in picture whenever, but thats official."
I have taken this example because you were saying that NTES is 'ALWAYS' correct. But here is a verifiable source that clearly shows that there are mistakes in NTES. If NTES can get the name for HPUR wrong, then why not for GMMG?
Railway...
more...

zones ALWAYS issue official notifications when station names are changed -ALWAYS. So, if Masagram was renamed as 'Gram Masagram' as you claim, then ER or SER should have issued a notification. But there is no such notification.
You are selectively picking only NTES and ignoring every other official source.
"you can keep data as per your convenience!!" - Aren't you doing the same thing? You are ignoring all other official sources. You are refusing to even accept that NTES 'might' have a mistake.
What's wrong with the sources that I pointed out? Aren't they official? RBS and PRS are also maintained by Indian railways. And you told me to not 'push the notification' - Why not? That notification was issued by the CCM of South Eastern Railway, not some random person. It is as official as it can get.
Could you please explain why an official notification issued by a railway zone is 'not valid evidence' ? If 3 'official sources' make one statement and 1 official source makes a different claim, then how can you conclude straightaway that the 1 official source is correct and the other three have to be ignored?