Search Forum
Blog Entry# 4782381
Posted: Nov 18 2020 (06:26)
5 Responses
Last Response: Nov 18 2020 (09:41)
5 Responses
Last Response: Nov 18 2020 (09:41)
With the new time table, it looks like the TRT is less than 5 hours at both ADI and MAS. Will this time be enough for PM and SM ?
I suspect a risk of this train will always depart late in case of late arrival of pairing train.
The example I wanted to quote here is MAQ MAS SF express which used to depart from MAS at 5 PM. Once its pairing train from MAQ arrived by 11 AM in the morning. The departure was delayed by 3...
more...
I suspect a risk of this train will always depart late in case of late arrival of pairing train.
The example I wanted to quote here is MAQ MAS SF express which used to depart from MAS at 5 PM. Once its pairing train from MAQ arrived by 11 AM in the morning. The departure was delayed by 3...
more...
Very Right ,tight schedule for long distance train .suferrer will be passenger
Mostly spare rake would be allocated at MAS end, as now abundance of rakes are there. If at all these timings come in regular runs, MAS would mostly implement RSA with some other trains. As PM of an LHB rake requires 8 hours.
When regulator train starts it may be alloted LHB which requires PM after 4000km at Chennai end. It may be given RSA with any other train.
I guess probably this is also one reason where RB has issued notification for standardisation of rakes. In case of very less TAT, they can still ensure that train departs on time using rake of any other train. But easier said than done. Ultimately passengers are sufferers. I always find the example of LTT-CBE/CBE-LTT which continuosuly used to run late for months together and then finally CR had to cancel running of one service to bring all of them back to track
Yes ,I have travelled on this train(Cbe-Ltt - sbc) on 4 occasions.my bad luck it was late on all 4 occasion ranging from 2 hours to 10 hours |!!!!