Spotting
 Timeline
 Travel Tip
 Trip
 Race
 Social
 Greeting
 Poll
 Img
 PNR
 Pic
 Blog
 News
 Conf TL
 RF Club
 Convention
 Monitor
 Topic
 #
 Rating
 Correct
 Wrong
 Stamp
 PNR Ref
 PNR Req
 Blank PNRs
 HJ
 Vote
 Pred
 @
 FM Alert
 FM Approval
 Pvt

RailCal app

site support

Yeh dil maange more (RailFans, while ending their trip) - Kirti Solanki

Search Forum
<<prev entry    next entry>>
Blog Entry# 5956239
Posted: Jan 30 (16:53)

31 Responses
Last Response: Feb 08 (17:46)
General Travel
66961 views
6

Jan 30 (16:53)   16511/K.S.R. Bengaluru - Kannur Express | CLT/Kozhikode Main (Calicut) (4 PFs)
Harsha_12627^~
Harsha_12627^~   4878 blog posts
Entry# 5956239            Tags  
1 compliments
Disagree:ആർക്കും ഉപയോഗമില്ല.
Extension of KSR Bengaluru - Kannur Express Upto Kozhikode. Details are as per following 👇🏻👇🏻
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

5 Public Posts - Tue Jan 30, 2024

16 Public Posts - Wed Jan 31, 2024

5 Public Posts - Thu Feb 01, 2024

1 Public Posts - Fri Feb 02, 2024

1 Public Posts - Sat Feb 03, 2024

1 Public Posts - Mon Feb 05, 2024

1 Public Posts - Thu Feb 08, 2024

14536 views
0

Feb 08 (17:46)
KaveriMail~
KaveriMail~   831 blog posts
Re# 5956239-34              
The UPA government which introduced a flurry of trains squeezed the MAQ CDO launching Maveli (only a weekly when introduced, then tri-weekly and daily), Ernad and CBE Intercity apart from the weeklies and bi-weeklies from other divisions/zones.

During the whole time (06-14) SWR was playing spoilsport for running passenger trains via Sakleshpur citing HMRDC. This paved the way for the resources of MAQ to be made available for Malabar.
...
more...

Maveli (becoming a daily) replacing Matsyagandha in the West Coast/Mail/Malabar RSA led to 6347/48 (another TVC train) being extended from CAN.

12685 which was introduced as a tri-weekly became the most patronized train of the route for end to end passengers and got a daily run. Same with 12133 (introduced as a Tri-weekly) which is preferrable ahead of Matsyagandha. But it is a CR train, so SR will not extend it to MAQ with Matsyagandha trailing it.

The NDA government which have tightened up purse strings on new trains in the south, have not helped Mangalore by much. And SR instead of accommodating/guaranteeing whatever little that comes are making it many times worse by extending the overnight SBC connection to CLT.

MAQ has just got 2 more PFs and 1 additional pitline than before. SR must ensure it deploys these resources primarily for trains via Hassan.

Else, MAQ CDO needs to be taken over by SWR by transferring at least the Padil-Kankanadi-MAQ line to SWR. SR would be able to maintain contiguity with KR this way and may eventually have to shift some of the existing trains to MAJN (where there is scope for additional development) or JOKT (which still remains a ghost station).

It would be similar to the arrangement NR and NER have in Varanasi or Bareilly.

Translate to English
Translate to Hindi
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom
Go to Desktop site
Important Note: This website NEVER solicits for Money or Donations. Please beware of anyone requesting/demanding money on behalf of IRI. Thanks.
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.
India Rail Info Privacy Policy