Search Forum
Blog Entry# 6099633
Posted: Jun 19 (09:55)
14 Responses
Last Response: Jun 21 (11:04)
14 Responses
Last Response: Jun 21 (11:04)
Whilst the CNB-ALD section runs at/beyond capacity and the trend is similar for CNB-ON-LKO section; we have tracks running from Unnao-Sitapur which are woefully underutilized and see only a single pair of passenger train per day. Same is for the ON-RBL tracks which too has too little trains. IR ought to upgrade these sections both to benefit passengers on this route and exploring alternate routes.
It'll help connect CNB with STP more efficiently. Also, I find it ironical that Kanpur-Allahabad has an alternate route sitting right next to the main route that...
more...
It'll help connect CNB with STP more efficiently. Also, I find it ironical that Kanpur-Allahabad has an alternate route sitting right next to the main route that...
more...
5 Public Posts - Wed Jun 19, 2024
7 Public Posts - Thu Jun 20, 2024
1 Public Posts - Fri Jun 21, 2024
Sir why I proposed that route is , Tirupati ko seedha Varanasi, Ayodhya ke liye connection milenge. Tirupati is lacking direct train to these both places for many days. Although SCR proposed TPTY BSBS , however other zones rejected it citing path constraints, and it will help passengers go to Naimisharanya too. Many Indians of South visit the above mentioned places sir