Search Forum
PNR Entry# 685217
Posted: Mar 04 2013 (11:43)
5 Responses
Last Response: Mar 05 2013 (09:20)
5 Responses
Last Response: Mar 05 2013 (09:20)
Journey: Tue Mar 05, 2013
Dep: VSG/Vasco-da-Gama @ 06:30 PF#: 1
Arr: BAY/Ballari Junction (Bellary) @ 16:18
Distance: 407 km / 2119 km
Class: Sleeper - SL | Tot Seats: Avbl >52 | Charting @20:00
18048/Vasco-da-Gama - Shalimar Amaravati Express (PT)Dep: VSG/Vasco-da-Gama @ 06:30 PF#: 1
Arr: BAY/Ballari Junction (Bellary) @ 16:18
Distance: 407 km / 2119 km
Class: Sleeper - SL | Tot Seats: Avbl >52 | Charting @20:00
PNR: 466-xxxxxxx | Similar PNRs
Entry# 685217
NO PENDING REQUEST
Posted: Mar 04 2013 (11:43:53) View Posted Status
Latest Status: Mar 05 2013 (13:54:44)
Passenger 2: S3,2 (Booking Status: W/L 327,GNWL)* Please Note that in case the Final Charts have not been prepared, the Current Status might upgrade/downgrade at a later stage.
Chart PREPARED
Today 11.43 AM WL 169... 7.50 Pm Confirmed... What happened...
But then in a day it has crossed around 170 WL plus another hundred RACs......
How's this possible?
How's this possible?
444 km / 2142 km
.
Pax are Traveling from VSG--BAY, Which is Just 444 Km's
So Due to Availability in that Section/Quota, it has been CNF.
.
Pax are Traveling from VSG--BAY, Which is Just 444 Km's
So Due to Availability in that Section/Quota, it has been CNF.
Of course I noticed the distance....
but isn't it weird that IR has allotted GNWL against it when it could be RLGN..... just inflating GNWLs...
but isn't it weird that IR has allotted GNWL against it when it could be RLGN..... just inflating GNWLs...