Spotting
 Timeline
 Travel Tip
 Trip
 Race
 Social
 Greeting
 Poll
 Img
 PNR
 Pic
 Blog
 News
 Conf TL
 RF Club
 Convention
 Monitor
 Topic
 #
 Rating
 Correct
 Wrong
 Stamp
 PNR Ref
 PNR Req
 Blank PNRs
 HJ
 Vote
 Pred
 @
 FM Alert
 FM Approval
 Pvt

RailCal app

site support

Vaigai வந்துருச்சு, ஆசையில் ஓடி வந்தேன்

Search Forum
<<prev entry    next entry>>
Blog Entry# 831300
Posted: Aug 19 2013 (14:26)

17 Responses
Last Response: Aug 28 2013 (10:20)
Rail Fanning
41852 views
26

★★★
Aug 19 2013 (14:26)   22686/Chandigarh - Yesvantpur Karnataka Sampark Kranti Express | DEE/Delhi Sarai Rohilla (5 PFs)
 
guest   2959 blog posts
Entry# 831300            Tags  
#LHBRake Of Chandigarh-Yesvantpur Karnataka Sampark Kranti Express parked @ Delhi Sarai Rohilla Pf.no.3.
Reference Blog:- /blog/post/826897
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

24 Posts

8112 views
1

Aug 25 2013 (09:11)
rajeshdb
rajeshdb   234 blog posts
Re# 831300-25              
you are right, 12649/50 is one of the most preferable train for many of the passengers. This should be given lhb first.
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

8766 views
0

Aug 25 2013 (11:47)
guest   2959 blog posts
Re# 831300-26              
yeah that's the right point to be noted.
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

7685 views
2

Aug 27 2013 (20:41)
anvitjoshi^~
anvitjoshi^~   2338 blog posts
Re# 831300-27              
Of course TT is what matters, but the Coach still play a vital role. Lets take an example of 12649/50 itself. It is an ICF rake train, capable of running at a max speed of 110 kmph. Now, SC - KZJ section is capable of handling trains at 120 kmph, further north, BPL - NZM is capable of handling 130 kmph (BPL Shatabdi hits 150 kmph and Some RAJ's hit 130 kmph - 140 kmph), but due to rake capacity, KSK will not be crossing 110 kmph mark. So if this train was given LHB, it could run at at least 120 kmph, hence reducing travel time. 22685/86 is a slow train, hence 12649/50 deserved that LHB Rake!
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

7882 views
0

Aug 27 2013 (20:53)
Himanshuu_Sharma~
Himanshuu_Sharma~   3477 blog posts
Re# 831300-28              
then more LHB rake will require for 12649 50 with 12629 30
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

8502 views
0

Aug 28 2013 (10:20)
anvitjoshi^~
anvitjoshi^~   2338 blog posts
Re# 831300-29              
Yes, however 22685/86 will need 2 rakes. They should have made 3 rakes and should have been assigned to 12649/50. The existing 5 ICF rakes could have been shared between 12629/30 and 22685/86.
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom
Go to Desktop site
Important Note: This website NEVER solicits for Money or Donations. Please beware of anyone requesting/demanding money on behalf of IRI. Thanks.
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.
India Rail Info Privacy Policy