 | dark mode |
RailCal app | site support |
NCR - maar bhi, raftaar bhi - Harshit Sharma
Search Forum
Post PNR
5353/Σ Bangalore-Parasnath pilgrim link ΣChain
Created: Mar 29 2012 (14:54) by KrisGopal^~
Description/Uses/Merits of this ΣChain Connects Bangalore with Parasnath,pilgrim centre.
Safe buffer.Though longer route. |
 |
ΣChain Blog
Page# Showing 1 to 5 of 2906 blog entries next>>
VSKP WAP-7 link may be come back again in this express and replace those trains who are currently running between Puri / Bhubaneswar to New Delhi / ANVT and New Delhi/ ANVT to Bhubaneswar/Puri once They are getting 100+ WATE P7 already started with Kalinga Utkal Express VSKP WAP-7
Jun 13 (10:32) 12801/Purushottam Express (PT) | PURI/Puri (8 PFs)
PrakharYadav^~
PrakharYadav^~ 13136 blog posts
Sub: - Renumbering of ECOR owned trains in new time table effective from 01.07.2024
Ref: - CPTM/ECOR COIS message no. 253 /ECoR/PCOM/CHG/PTT/15/24dated 11.06.2024.
No.1-TT/Change in WTT/2023-24. Vide reference to (1) above, East Coast Railway has notified to revise the following train numbers with effect new time table which will come into effect from 01.07.2024. The details are
as...
more...
Ref: - CPTM/ECOR COIS message no. 253 /ECoR/PCOM/CHG/PTT/15/24dated 11.06.2024.
No.1-TT/Change in WTT/2023-24. Vide reference to (1) above, East Coast Railway has notified to revise the following train numbers with effect new time table which will come into effect from 01.07.2024. The details are
as...
more...
12801 is highest revenue generating train. Runs fully jampacked throughout the year. Now if railway does this, railway will only face the loss in revenue. And someone tell me, why 12875 is not de-graded instead of 12801. Even 12875 TT is slower, already having too much halts in central UP due to which its Avg speed is too slow to qualify as SF. Even its priority is too poor having SF category
1.Train no of 12801/02 Purushottam Superfast Express will be changed to 18401/18402 W.E.F 01.07.24
2.Train no. of 12892/91 PURI - BGY will be changed to 18404/18403 W.E.F 01.07.24.
52 Posts
Railway ministry ab Tughlak chalata hai.. So anything can happen. Aaj purushottam toh kal Tamilnadu, Telangana, Coromandel , Geetanjali pe bhi Aisa news aa jaega..
Instead of making such benchmark why don't IR try to make this train more faster and then set on their benchmark(I know this is next to impossible, this is fastest train on its route)
Aram se 65 kmph pe jaa sakti hai Purushottam. Useless halts need to be removed. Abhi hi 60 se upar hai. Nandan Kanan, Odisha Sampark Kranti and Purushottam can retain SF tag even if the SF category goes to 65 kmph, abit speed up and schedule adjustment is the necessity.
Focus of any minister is to get appreciation for their work. If it is short term succes then it is their best chance to do so. So current RM is focused on launching VBs and doesn't bother other things. He might approve to degrade 12801for their purposes. There won't be any response even if we raise this question.
Page# Showing 1 to 5 of 2906 blog entries next>>
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom