 |  |  |
dark mode |
Eat-Sleep-Railfanning ЁЯФД Repeat - Shankar Mehani
Search Forum
Post PNR
TRAIN IS CANCELLED
82505⇒82505x/Pune - Kamakhya Suvidha SpecialрдкреБрдгреЗ - рдХрд╛рдорд╛рдЦреНрдпрд╛ рд╕реБрд╡рд┐рдзрд╛ рд╕реНрдкреЗрд╢рд▓
BSP/Bilaspur Junction --> ASN/Asansol Junction
Updated: by JoydeepRoy
Train Forum
Oct 10 2016 (00:14) 82505x/Pune - Kamakhya Suvidha Special | BD/Badnera Junction (Amravati) (4 PFs)
Chetanneware95gmail.~
Chetanneware95gmail.~ 1537 blog postsWhy Official Regular Halt not alloted important stations Badnera and Akola stations?
Oct 15 2016 (12:37) 82505x/Pune - Kamakhya Suvidha Special | BD/Badnera Junction (Amravati) (4 PFs)
Chetanneware95gmail.~
Chetanneware95gmail.~ 1537 blog posts
Oct 01 2016 (19:41) 12041/Howrah - New Jalpaiguri Shatabdi Express | NJP/New Jalpaiguri Junction (8 PFs)
Vaibhav Agarwal
Vaibhav Agarwal 6716 blog posts
Sep 13 2016 (02:42) 82506/Kamakhya - Pune Suvidha Special
12101JnaneswariSuperDelux
12101JnaneswariSuperDelux 497 blog posts
Aisa to flights me bhi nahi hota.
I am not against fare hike or flexi fare if it raises revenue for railways but this is totally baseless and unjustifiable.
Dynamic fare principle at work. Bilaspur to Pune has much lesser seats left, hence the dynamic component of the fare has shot up while Kamakhya Pune still has many vacant berths. It does look stupid though, it's maybe because the difference in base fare is not so much while the dynamic fare dominates extremely
Ya what u said is rte...but quota system should be made general for all the stations in suvidha.
Jul 20 2016 (18:54) 82505x/Pune - Kamakhya Suvidha Special | HN/Hathbandh (4 PFs) | TATA/WAG-7/28233
DJRF2012^~
DJRF2012^~ 21368 blog posts
!!!RARE SIGHT!!!
.
Triplet WAG-7's doing the honors of 1.5 hrs late running 82505 PUNE-KYQ Suvidha Spl stunned by raging 12130 Azad Hind Exp smashing Hathbandh @Flat MPS. AJNI WAG-9 31074 also witnesses the show
.
Video...
more...
.
Triplet WAG-7's doing the honors of 1.5 hrs late running 82505 PUNE-KYQ Suvidha Spl stunned by raging 12130 Azad Hind Exp smashing Hathbandh @Flat MPS. AJNI WAG-9 31074 also witnesses the show
.
Video...
more...
By the pic posted, I see only one WAG7 is powered (leading loco), the rest are shut down. Am I correct or am I missing something? If so, might be a loco failure or any technical problem.
In such case (if only one loco is powered), we can't consider them as triplets. Only when all the three are powered, then only they are considered to be triplets.
In such case (if only one loco is powered), we can't consider them as triplets. Only when all the three are powered, then only they are considered to be triplets.
Yes ur correct... Most probably these locos would have been available and alloted this train to haul... Generally crew dont detach (Un-Mu) loco as unMuing and MUeing is a long and tiresome process... hence triplets but only one is powering the train... rest are shut down...
All the three might not be mued. Mued locos can be unmued only at the shed (few exceptions here also). As per my guess, the rest might be for the shed movement.
Scroll to Top