Search Forum
Blog Entry# 5344870
Posted: May 14 2022 (15:55)
7 Responses
Last Response: May 14 2022 (19:01)
7 Responses
Last Response: May 14 2022 (19:01)
Reliability of LHB coaches poorer than ICF coaches in comparison with more amount of secondary detachment, asset failure and punctuality losses (due to speed restrictions). Main causes are poor infrastructure for handling, using indigenous items with poor reliability in place of foreign items and poor gross to tare ratio(different then specification of Alstom) Source-(RDSO report ) . Along with it is a picture of condition of rubber items during SS in workshops where the condition of most items deteriorates and failure rate is b/w 60 to 140℅.
2 Posts
Older ones (2000-2010/11)were more reliable especially the AC ones but due to poor material from regional vendors and increasing tare weight from 39 tonnes to 46 tonnes(avg)due to bio tank &different furnishing items it has crossed the design pay load of Alstom.
Quality control and testing can help . Trainsets have there own set of problems like the under gear motors need proper covering, fencing to avoid damage to the nose, pantry space issues and the high cost of production due to unnecessary specifications added by RDSO. They need to work on improving real issues which are increasing there operational costs.
Also i think if we can't develop indigenous parts which can match the quality of the foreign ones and which are unreliable better to use the foreign parts.
Yes atleast the time and cost lost in the process will be saved even though the cost of the foreign parts is little high.