Spotting
 Timeline
 Travel Tip
 Trip
 Race
 Social
 Greeting
 Poll
 Img
 PNR
 Pic
 Blog
 News
 Conf TL
 RF Club
 Convention
 Monitor
 Topic
 #
 Rating
 Correct
 Wrong
 Stamp
 PNR Ref
 PNR Req
 Blank PNRs
 HJ
 Vote
 Pred
 @
 FM Alert
 FM Approval
 Pvt

RailCal app

site support

Uttarbanga Exp: উত্তরের আত্মার আত্মীয় - Avinaba Bose

Search Forum
<<prev entry    next entry>>
Blog Entry# 1172929
Posted: Jul 28 2014 (19:41)

7 Responses
Last Response: Aug 09 2014 (18:10)
General Travel
3667 views
6

Jul 28 2014 (19:41)   CAN/Kannur (Cannanore) (4 PFs)
 
guest   1416 blog posts
Entry# 1172929            Tags  
Registration Number : MORLY/E/2014/06535
Name Of Complainant : Shuhaib
Date of Receipt : 30 Jun 2014
Received by : Ministry of Railways, ( Railway Board)
Forwarded to : Palghat Division
...
more...

Contact Address : Railway Divisional Office, Southern Railway,
Palghat
678002
Grievance Description : For reducing the long gap between both the sections(Kannur-Mangalore Kannur-Kozhikode), new passenger trains can be introduced during the long gap between 11AM and 2PM, as there is no daily train between 11.25hrs 13.50hrs(2hrs 25 mts. gap) from Kannur to Kozhiode and no daily train between 11.15hrs 14.25hrs(3hrs10 mts. gap) from Kannur to Mangalore. Also, from Mangalore, there is no daily train to Kozhikode between 8AM 11.45AM(between CBE FP CBE ICE) with a gap of 3hrs 45mts. New Mangalore Central-Kozhikode passenger shall be introduced, leaving Mangalore at 9.45AM, arriving Kannur at 12.40hrs, leaving Kannur at 12.45hrs and arriving Kozhikode at 15.00hrs. This train will fill the whole long gap between Mangalore to Kozhikode. Also, the existing Thrissur-Kannur Passenger can be extended upto Mangalore, leaving Kannur at 13.00hrs, as a connection to Ernakulam-Kannur Intercity Express. As TCR-CAN passenger (56603) arrives Kannur at 12.20hrs, the train can stay at Kannur for 40 minutes and arriving Mangalore at 4PM. This train be same like CAN-SRR passenger(56602), which arrives Kozhikode at 17.05hrs and leaves CLT at 18.10hrs, waiting for 65 mts at CLT. The existing rake of CHV-MAQ Passenger(5661) can be utilized for new MAQ-CLT passenger. For the existing CAN-SRR passenger(56602), new rake has to be used, as the rake of TCR-CAN passenger(56603) is used for CAN-SRR passenger. We are expecting a new passenger train in this upcoming budget. With regards Shuhaib.p
Current Status : CASE CLOSED
Date of Action : 28 Jul 2014
Details : The receipt of your grievance is hereby acknowledged. This has reference to your grievance cited above. Introduction of new trains is a policy matter to be decided by Railway Board. The division has already proposed to run one pair of passenger train between CAN-MAQ and back, vide this office letter No.J/T.454/-92 dated 08.08.2007 and included in the time table proposal of 2007-08, 2008-09, forwarded to CPTM/MAS, but it ws not agreed by the railway

Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

2 Posts

855 views
0

Jul 30 2014 (21:18)
RFIR~
RFIR~   6898 blog posts
Re# 1172929-3              
Within the last 2 days this is the second grievance which i am seeing posted by a member where reply has been received within one month. This is amazing.
As regards the standard answer by the railways, dont know what will actually convince the railway board. Are there specific parameters that they look to get convinced for introducing new trains etc?
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

1205 views
0

Jul 30 2014 (21:29)
guest   1416 blog posts
Re# 1172929-4              
I think you mentioned sajin's post.. Actually my grievance forwarded to ADRM of PGT DIVN on 08/07/14.. After two days ie on 10/07/14 the status shown as UNDER PROCESS.. And got reply on 28/07/14..
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

782 views
1

Jul 30 2014 (21:56)
RFIR~
RFIR~   6898 blog posts
Re# 1172929-5              
That is right. I was actually surprised by the swiftness of response since normally most of the times i have seen the replies never come or it is most of the time under process.
At least in these cases there was some response even though the response may not have been satisfactory
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

1392 views
1

Jul 31 2014 (00:01)
Krishna Kumar   206 blog posts
Re# 1172929-6              
I agree. Introduction of new train is policy matter. But, Railway can introduce new trains or extend the existing trains as per the available resources. Kannur - Yesvantpur express was bifurcated and extended upto Karwar based on this matter, as it was not announced in the Railway budget or in the budget discussion, but due to a mention by High Court.
Translate to English
Translate to Hindi

1540 views
0

Aug 09 2014 (18:10)
Krishna Kumar   206 blog posts
Re# 1172929-7               Past Edits
It seems like that Railway was waiting for such an order from Karnataka High Court. Soon after the verdict on Oct-8-2012, Railway extended the train to Karwar on Nov-1-2012, as the High Court had directed to do the same on or before Nov-15-2012. Moreover, High Court had directed to split the train into half(12 coaches to Kannur and 12 to Karwar) by adding 8 more coaches to 16 coaches running at that time running only to Kannur. But, after bifurcation, Railway put just 5 coaches to Kannur(later increased to 8) and 15 coaches to Karwar and the passengers from Kannur had to wait for 2 hours at Mangalore Central for the Karwar train to arrive and proceed to Yesvantpur after amalgamation. Regarding the number of coaches, Railways didn't follow High Court directives. Railway had provided a completely wrong information that just less than 100 passengers...
more...
used to travel to Kannur in this train after Mangalore. Even reserved passengers were much more than this figure between Mangalore&Kannur. Is Railway ready to provide the number of passengers now between Mangalore & Karwar in this train? During peak season(April-July) and during Onam, Vishu, Chirstmas, Eid, entrance exams, etc, the trains are full with waiting list starting from almost 2 month ahead for a period of atleast 1 week. As the combined population of Kannur&Kasargod districts(3830378) is around 50% more than the combined population of Udupi&Uttara Kannada districts(2614530) and the train runs just 115km(out of 132km) through these districts (Kannur&Kasaragod) and 216km(out of 258km) through Udupi & Uttara Kannada districts. If we include both Suratkal & Mulki also, the population is much higher. People from other neighboring districts such as Chikmagalur, Dharwad, Belgaum, Shimoga, Haveri, South Goa, etc use this train very rarely. As the people from Kodagu district will be using this train on Mangalore-Yesvantpur route and from Wayanad, Mahe & Kozhikode districts also, the use of this train is very rare. Before introduction of Bangalore trains(around 10 years back) from Mangaore or Kannur, around 100 buses used to ply between Kannur&Kasargod districts to Bangalore, which is much higher than the number of Bangalore buses from both Uttara Kannada & Udupi districts. There were much more buses to Bangalore than the buses to state capital Trivandrum from both these districts, as many used to travel to Bangalore and Mysore for business, education, tour, trade, jobs, etc. It is clear that more people travel to Bangalore from these north Kerala districts than Udupi & Uttara Kannada districts. Still Railway is playing something dumb & deaf game. It was a very good and justifiable decision to extend this train upto Karwar, as it deserves to have connection with its state capital. But, both the sides are to be checked for extending the train. Always, there is a step-mother treatment to Kerala by Railway. They didn't consider Kannur-Yesvantpur express as mother train. The child train had 3 times the number of coaches than the mother train. When Palakkad division was bifurcated and Salem division was formed, Salem division had more route kilometers than the mother division. The reason they said was the regions in Tamilnadu should be part of the division in TN, not in Kerala. Moreover, the people are shrinking to its own state, rather than the India as a whole. Even no state will give this much water to Tamil Nadu that also almost free of cost. Still they say their own Tamilnadu. Kerala is the Most Generous State in India in giving and the Poorest State in India in Taking. It is 100% Reality.

Translate to English
Translate to Hindi
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Bottom
Go to Desktop site
Important Note: This website NEVER solicits for Money or Donations. Please beware of anyone requesting/demanding money on behalf of IRI. Thanks.
Disclaimer: This website has NO affiliation with the Government-run site of Indian Railways. This site does NOT claim 100% accuracy of fast-changing Rail Information. YOU are responsible for independently confirming the validity of information through other sources.
India Rail Info Privacy Policy